0% chance.
1) nobody wants any knicks players.
2) kidd wants to win, so this would defeat the purpose of a trade.
3) knicks already have a nasty point guard.
knicks are my favorite team so i don't want you to think i'm bashing them, but it's true. and i really don't think the knicks need kidd. sure he would help but he's not that big of an imporvement over marbury. i'd like to see the unit they have come together as a team, rather than trading everybody away.
i don't understand why everybody's making a big deal about the knicks. they had 1 bad loss. they've been playing great lately, and if they win a few more games they're right back up in the top 8. everyone's just looking to hate on the knicks for some reason and i'm sick of it. i think they're fine and i think they can compete in the east.
2007-12-06 04:32:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by j rock 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
There's really nothing the Knicks have on the roster that would interest the Nets. You'd have to give up Eddie Curry in the deal and the Knicks always say he's not available for the deal. If you were NJ, would you want Marbury, Crawford, or any of their swing players for a top 5 point guard?
No way.
2007-12-06 04:34:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Paul H 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ehh Raymond Felton... Dont get Kidd he avg 5 factors and assists he in user-friendly terms has a million or 2 years. Shumpert is the guy who could in basic terms get traded even nonetheless is thrilling. Dont spend the money on the two guy actually, Get your call personalised on a Knick jersey with fav quantity alittle greater costly yet you're able to get traded!
2016-10-02 07:00:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by procter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Knicks don't want Kidd, atleast I don't think so. In a year, Kidd will be just another overpaid bloated contract who has an ego baggage and non-performance on the court. He'll get everybody fired and put Knicks in deeper financial doo-doo like he did with Nets, by using his influence in the media.
2007-12-06 04:57:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If the Knicks can somehow trick the Nets into taking back Marbury, then I can see a trade happening.
A trio of Carter, Jefferson, and Randolph doesn't sound half bad, though.
2007-12-06 08:19:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He isn't selfish enough to play for the Knicks. Nobody wants anyone on the Knicks so not gonna happen.
2007-12-06 06:28:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
20% unless the Knicks trade for Stephon Marbury and 1st round draft pick I don't see that trade happening.
2007-12-06 04:29:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Antwuan (Giants Superbowl XLVI Champs!!!) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Knicks make a move to improve their team? I don't know about that.
2007-12-06 04:41:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Kidd wants to go to Cleveland to play with Lebron and therefore one team will have two of the best triple double players in the league.Cleveland has a few players that could attract New Jersey.
2007-12-06 04:47:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by martyb5154+SFCU+pray4revival 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
If they do, they would ask for NAte Robinson, and a 1st round pick, now that would be awesome.
2007-12-06 10:56:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Samer Alsabbagh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋