If one truely believes in freedom of religion (US Constitution), how does one then demand that a citizen be a particular religion to be considered for their party's primary?
2007-12-06 01:57:34 · 8 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
notadum (below) Feel free to post links to my "reams of bigoted anti-Christian questions" or feel free to apologize for the accusation.
Allow me to provide a link to one of my religious statements below.
Beware of False Prophets (YA blog)
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-I7hdMHQyc68vSWCX4mXGb9LtM2M-?cq=1&p=3
2007-12-06 02:08:06 · update #1
Locutus1 (below) Reality much?
It is evident to everyone "else" that Romney's numbers (support) has tanked. The largest GOP block that have tanked Romney are the so-called Evangelical Christians within the GOP. To discount their ownership of the GOP is a fantasy. Q, its OK to take off the Bush-goggles.
2007-12-06 03:44:22 · update #2
Agreed. It shouldn't matter one bit.
Personally, I think Romney should not even have his "Faith" speech. He has about 15% support, give or take, amongst Republicans depending on which poll you look at. My question for him would be, "Out of that 85% left over, how many do you think are not voting for you because you are a Mormon?" I would think and hope its a low number. . . maybe 2%.
My problem with Romney doesn't come from his faith. That is his business. My problem with Romney is that he does not lead. I can accept the fact that has changed his mind on abortion, but in my opinion he has been dreadful in the debates. When they asked him if waterboarding is torture, he came up with the weak answer of basically "I'd have to consult with experts in the field". My question to that is, "You're going to be President. Why wouldn't you have formulated an opinion on that already?"
He needs to come across as much more decisive if he wants to win. If he doesn't, he's done.
2007-12-06 02:07:14 · answer #1 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The same way Liberals demand that they not be religious at all.
It seems that Romney and Huckabee are more objectionable to Democrats than to Republicans. Romney's popularity would seem to negate the very statement you make. The group you reference apparently is not large enough to make a noticeable difference.
You appear to be hate mongering with this question as Romney is enjoying vast support and is at least the second runner.
2007-12-06 02:14:39 · answer #2 · answered by Locutus1of1 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it's totally different than, say, when Kennedy talked about Catholicism... Mormonism is seen by most people outside of it as a cult. i mean, come on -- magic underwear? ruling your own planet? they REALLY believe those things. i know plenty of Mormons, and i like them just fine. but run the country? i don't think so.
2007-12-06 02:09:38 · answer #3 · answered by Andrew 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. I don't understand it. He is having to make a speech on it today, much like Kennedy did to alleve worries about his Catholocism. Like Kennedy, people should look at his record. I don't think he consulted Salt Lake City for decision making advice while he governed Mass.
2007-12-06 02:02:56 · answer #4 · answered by booman17 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because evangelicals believe Mormonism is a cult.
2007-12-06 02:06:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-12-06 02:06:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Given your reams of bigoted anti-Christian questions you have no right to ask this one. Get a job.
2007-12-06 02:03:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
It's a litmus test.
You know, like killing the unborn is for the left. Right?
2007-12-06 02:02:05 · answer #8 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋