i need this for a history report and i think he is i just can not explain why
2007-12-06 01:35:46 · 7 answers · asked by young_britt_09 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
I think we need to give MLK more credit. It would have been amazing to see what he could accomplish had his life not been cut short. The two were in different positions, which greatly affected the results of their work. However, they were both working for freedom for the oppressed.
Seems like there were some comparisons and some contrasts between the two. Interesting topic!
2007-12-06 02:28:58 · answer #1 · answered by Woods 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
King adopted Gandhi's passive resistance strategy for social change.
2007-12-06 01:39:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not to me
Ghandi delivered an entire nation from oppression by the English.
King talked about it.
King had a dream
Ghandi had action.
Dreamers dream, doers do.
2007-12-06 01:43:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
to me is yes because both of them stand up and fight for their peoples such as gandhi want the freedom from british and martin want the right for black people in white man's country...
2007-12-06 01:40:29 · answer #4 · answered by aiman 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, because Gandhi was Indian, and MLK wasn't.
2007-12-06 01:38:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
yeah like totally
MLK totally embraced Gandhji's non violence principle.... chek dat out on da net
2007-12-06 01:40:37 · answer #6 · answered by Raga s 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, they are two pacifist that die defending their believes, both with strong conviction in the non-violence way of solving problems.
2007-12-06 01:40:06 · answer #7 · answered by Joako 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋