English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

did he not lie???

2007-12-06 00:35:01 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

im talking about him saying ww3 over Iran having nuclear technology when he knew in 2003 that they stoped all programs...

2007-12-06 00:40:28 · update #1

17 answers

Kucinich thinks so, but, Pelosi has already stated that the Democrats will not persue impeachment of George W.

2007-12-06 00:37:19 · answer #1 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 8 1

He did not know in 2003 that they stopped, the report is only 2 weeks old.
The only thing we knew before this was that they had turned over blueprints for nuclear weapons to UN inspectors, and now they have created nearly 30,000 enrichment subterfuges capable of creating either nuclear fuel or nuclear weapons grade uranium.
We had assumed that they were building the subterfuges to create weapons, but it appears that they stopped working on nukes in 2003, stopped working on them, therefore they had been working on them before. We had simply assumed that they had continued working on them until now, which was a safe assumption since the president of Iran threatened to wipe Israel off the face of the earth last year.

2007-12-06 01:06:48 · answer #2 · answered by Doggzilla 6 · 1 0

Do you have self assurance each thing you study dude. besides, an impeachment would take so long that the so referred to as attack on iran would be over till now the action replaced into taken. Mellow out & get a grip. end believing each and all of the media hype.

2016-11-13 20:30:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Look, if you took the time to look at history, you will find that most Presidents have made decisions based on information provided them, that proved wrong in the end. Look at WW2 and the attack on Pearl Harbor!!!. Evidence presented to the CNC said couldn't happen, and it did. Kennedy got us in SEA and 10 years later, after LBJ goofed up and Nixon, we get out and had been getting the wrong intelligence all along.

Remember, Congress voted to go to war based on the same information Bush had at the time, now, everyone wants to abandon ship cause its " not the popular thing to do".
It is because of the dedication of our people in uniform and Homeland Security, that we have not had another attack, but, if we did, how many of you and how many in Congress would change their minds, AGAIN???

2007-12-06 00:42:11 · answer #4 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 4 1

Just like 9/11...........when will people wake up to what Bush's agenda is for us???

I think all those cheeky bastards should've been gone the day of the election.......which Bush stole the votes. Gore would've been President if Jeb Bush didn't tamper with the votes. That's the only reason he's even running things......running inside ops with family members to pull all the strings.....so if that's possible with voting then what the hell do you think is possible with everything he says and does???


WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU'RE BEING LIED TO>>You only need to add 2 ll's and an i and t to BUSH to know what that spells.......

2007-12-06 00:53:27 · answer #5 · answered by squishy 3 · 1 3

Shouldn't you be accusing the N.I.E. of lying, not the President?
Oh wait, when in doubt, blame Bush.
And, rethink your time line. No one "knew" that they had supposedly stopped until this latest report was issued.

2007-12-06 00:40:52 · answer #6 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 5 2

Could you imagine if we were a dictatorship? Bush would be in power forever because of these foolish Republicans. How do they not see truth when it is presented to them on a golden platter?

2007-12-06 00:46:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

The president didn't lie, so no to the impeachment.

2007-12-06 00:42:10 · answer #8 · answered by MrOrph 6 · 6 2

yeah because Iran really doesn't have nuclear weapons
ill believe that the day Hilary is elected.
which is never

2007-12-06 00:38:29 · answer #9 · answered by Seth D 3 · 2 4

Lying is NOT a crime unless done under oath in a court proceeding......and you need a CRIME for impeachment....sorry there libby...

2007-12-06 00:45:18 · answer #10 · answered by Try Reality 4 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers