You are right to question the demonising of Saddam. When you look at the history, Saddam was a friend of the USA right up until he failed to vanquish Iran. It was the West that sold him the weapons that he used to murder the Kurds and he was still a friend of your administration afterwards. He thought he was still a friend when he was duped into invading Kuwait and gave Bush and Rumsfeld and all the other bright sparks the excuse to invade Iraq. People should try to look at the facts, not the propaganda.
2007-12-05 22:00:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by checkmate 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
NIE's main authors include three former State Department officials with previous reputations as "hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials," according to an intelligence source. They are Tom Fingar, formerly of the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research; Vann Van Diepen, the National Intelligence Officer for WMD; and Kenneth Brill, the former U.S. Ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
In any case, the real issue is not Iran's nuclear weapons program, but its nuclear program, period. As the NIE acknowledges, Iran continues to enrich uranium on an industrial scale--that is, build the capability to make the fuel for a potential bomb.
2007-12-06 06:04:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
In fact Saddam was a dictator but the way had been used to move him from Iraq was Illegal way that is why most of world did not support this war, and yes he killed a lots of Iraqi Kurdish, Iraqi Shi'ite and Sonny
2007-12-06 05:56:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by awgaa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saddam was a good man for his allies but a mass executioner when referred to by the Kurds.
2007-12-06 05:51:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You guys slay me. How many Kurds do you know? No, wait... do you have any friends of friends that know any Kurds? NO wait Do you have friends that ever heard of Kurds BEFORE the US needed to justify its invasion of another sovereign nation? Yeah, that's what I thought. Lemmings...
2007-12-06 06:08:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by johnhdavisjrusa20 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
None of them, but you forgot to mention that the US. supported Saddam before, during, and after the slaughter of the Kurds. It takes quite an effort to select fragments of history to support your views.
2007-12-06 07:36:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by . 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh, c'mon, kurdish babies, gimme a break!
2007-12-06 06:07:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr. Spock 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
maybe saddam was executed quickly so he couldn't spill the beans that it was the americans(bush's father) who sold him the nerve gas,maybe you sould ask the native inidans,koreans, vietnamese, etc, who wasted thier babies
2007-12-06 07:03:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Excellent question ThorGirl. These liberal lemmings love to pick and choose the intel they use for their propaganda pieces.
2007-12-06 05:51:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu6xF1FdHTTwBz_VXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTE5amZmNXI1BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDNgRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA0Y5NDVfMTIyBGwDV1Mx/SIG=133hbmncc/EXP=1197024709/**http%3a//hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/
2007-12-06 05:53:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mr Clean 4
·
0⤊
0⤋