This is irrelevant. Those colonial war days of seizing natural resources are over.
2007-12-05 23:01:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by David_the_Great 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hear what you are saying. Forget politics or who worked for what company back when.
here's the deal.
Oil is a vital resource to the USA and the West. Like it or not, that is what we use. We borrow $1 Billion a day so we can buy foreign oil.
If the oil supply was cut off in the gulf, it could cripple the Western economies. Do you want to pay $175.00 a gal for gas?
Until we can get more energy independent (got the oil companies, and the auto makers to fight on this one), we will be dependent on foreign oil.
Like it or not that is how it is. This really is an old old question.
The US had a plan to get in and defeat Saddam, but no plan how to get out. There was obvious errors here.
If you allow a criminal to flourish, they will.
PS Agree with above note:
Cheney is not even a top shareholder of Haliburton
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=HAL
I don't even see him selling any stock
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=HAL
PPS Halliburton is an oil service company. Not an oil driller, not an oil producer, not an oil refiner, not a gas producing entity. You need to get pissed at the those people.
http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/overview.asp?symbol=HAL.N
2007-12-05 21:55:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Net Advisor™ 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
USA are there for oil no need to lie.
You went to Iraq because of WMD and because of Saddam.
when you went their they reports say that they USA did not find any WMD, you think that USA will be smarter than that, USA has they they intelligence to know that Saddam did not have any WMD. so it comes down to this USA security sucks or they want oil. logical answer is they oil.
and whoever said "so what", here is what people are dying fathers, sons, brothers, mothers, and everybody else. I am guessing that nobody you know are in Iraq, so think about they children who will never again see their family again, sucks does ain't it.
and even if Saddam had WMD why did USA stay in that country once they proved that he did not have any WMD, let me give you a guess it is black stuff called Oil.
and also who said they could take they middle east any day you are wrong.
Turkey, Iran, UAE, Yemen and almost any Islamic country in the world will help they middle east.
Russia have Oil they are getting from they middle east, and they will take their middle east side, also helping them with weapons. it is obvious that USA can not take they middle east.
before USA invaded Iraq, thay had not threated on a single American life.
2007-12-07 21:00:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by liverpool fan MAN U SUCKS 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
you mustn't gulp the koolaid once you drink it. it provides you with a headache. Obama began the assaults. He hiding at the back of the "that's Bush's fault" He owns Afgan and the events. He has proclaimed it a mandatory conflict. Cheney is extra of a hero to u . s . a . of america of u . s . a . of america than something that crawls out of the white domicile now.
2016-12-30 09:29:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe that this is true, Saddam had, and used W.M.D.'s as recently as 1991.....that's good enough for me!
But lets just say for a moment that the war is about oil......SO WHAT? Oil is life blood of the civilized world, now, and for generations to come. Maintaining a stable supply of crude oil is just as much of a national defense issue as W.M.D.'s in the hands of a madman.
Oh I forgot Bush lied....people died......as the parrot repeated
2007-12-05 21:49:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kirk 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Cheney makes no profit off oil. Haliburton is not an "oil" company. Here get educated read this link.
http://www.factcheck.org/kerry_ad_falsely_accuses_cheney_on_halliburton.html
2007-12-05 21:53:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I am so sick and tired of you guys. Saying that the Iraq war is about oil. You know if we wanted too we could take control of all the middle east oil. Nobody could stop us. Did we take over any oil fields after the first gulf war or the current one NO?. So just shut the F(*&^ up
2007-12-05 22:00:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
On behalf of conservatives everywhere id like to thank you for so graphically illustrating the intense need to vote conservative in the next election. Its quite clear that skewed reasoning in the face of legitimate terrorism is needed to run this country and that, also clearly isnt apparent in this post. We need more liberal extremists like you to further our cause and I would like to invite you to post again soon. To answer your question, there is no proof because there is no logic or reason to your reasoning. In other words your question has no answer. Im sure al qaeda would like you to go on thinking its about oil so when/if that ludicrous idea of unilateral surrender ever passes they can demonstrate that it isnt and never was. and you can thank several soldiers who fought and died in iraq for your continued right to display your naivete in this forum.
2007-12-05 21:52:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hitler realized the future was about controlling OIL and so has everyone hence....... We like Medicine and food and heat and transportation and jobs and will fight for it......
2007-12-05 21:41:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by ThorGirl 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
You do not need a proof you need to move against this war
2007-12-05 21:41:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by awgaa 3
·
2⤊
1⤋