The USA spent billions of dollars in national security trying to avoid terrorist to come to USA to kill people. However it is a dissapoint that the door is open to crazy people to buy wepons and kill people inside USA. In fact I think if terrorists come inside of USA it will be so easy for them to get weapons inside USA. By the way I got tired of the National Rifle Association.
2007-12-05 20:42:58 · 9 answers · asked by onesonofgod 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Omaha is only the beginning! These types of incidents will increase and become more and more horrible. It will happen at schools,shopping malls, concerts, and churches! Where ever people are found in large numbers you're going to see events unfold! Individual privacy will cease to exist! Guns will be every where. People will demand their right to carry arms! People will actually hire others to go to areas that have high concentrations of people,to stand in there place! Private body guards and escorts will become the norm for some! Try to imagine what is coming in the near future!
2007-12-06 00:02:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Last I heard, when the government observes a terrorist that wants to buy a gun, they don't stop the terrorist from buying a gun. The reason they do this is so that they can catch other terrorists.
You don't think that they could have did the same thing on 9/11, but instead looked the other way, do you?
Frankly, only people can defend themselves.
2007-12-05 20:50:00 · answer #2 · answered by Arcanum Noctis 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not really. That lunatic chose another "gun free zone" to do his shooting. The problem IMO is not enough sensible armed people who could stop such an idiot immediately.
I do not advocate that every person on the street carries a gun (though I do not oppose it) but I would be safer knowing that many sensible armed citizens are around. If they were organised into some type of "volunteer sheriff's deputy" movement - allowing for organisation, training, etc - even better
I personally get tired of hearing that the cure for bad anti-gun laws is more bad anti-gun laws. If too many guns are the problem, how come no one ever starts a shooting spree on a rifle range?
2007-12-05 20:58:18 · answer #3 · answered by cp_scipiom 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Well, there are two problems with getting rid of all the guns:
1) It's in our Constitution that we have the right to own guns. We would have to repeal that.
2) So many people already have guns, that it would be impossible to get rid of all of them now.
People who have mental disorders are not allowed to carry guns; so "crazy" people don't generally buy them. But, what we can't prevent is a "normal" person from buying one (who has no criminal record)....and then going out and blowing away 10 people. I don't know how to stop that.
2007-12-05 20:47:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
I feel the same way about hit-and-run drivers.
It is time to cut commerce of automobiles in the USA.
By the way I got tired of General Motors.
2007-12-05 20:48:32 · answer #5 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 10⤊ 0⤋
Just a thought -- I don't think you're American, but you seem to be posing as one. No American would write as you do -- especially asking about "cut commerce of weapons".
2007-12-05 22:01:52 · answer #6 · answered by wenteast 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
He could have driven his car thru a crowd of people instead.
2007-12-05 20:52:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Clearly terrorism is less of a threat to US people than your own crazies. I think that the general feeling about US gun laws by peaceful people in other countries is that they are barking and you really need to do something about it - even if it does mean constitutional reform!
2007-12-05 20:47:31 · answer #8 · answered by Ellesar 6 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Yes I do
2007-12-05 20:50:11 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas B 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋