I think I can suggest a simpler solution than NorthStar's. I'll assume the given points P1, P2, P3 and P4 are ORDERED: let A, B, C, D are consequent vertexes of the required square, P1 is on AB, P2 - on BC, P3 - on CD and P4 - on DA. Please follow the link to see how it is looking like:
http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc101/Andrey_Dyukmedzhiev/Square-1.gif
Part 1 (Analysis): let P1' is an orthogonal projection of P1 on CD, P2' - projection of P2 on DA and let's draw a line through P2, perpendicular to P1P3, intersecting DA in a point, say Q. Then triangles P1P1'P3 and P2P2'Q are congruent. Hence |P2Q| = |P1P3| and we have 2 points on DA, that will help in the construction below.
Part 2 (Construction): Connect P1 with P3, draw a line, perpendicular to P1P3 through P2, take on it a point Q such that |P2Q| = |P1P3| (see details below). The line P4Q is one of the required sides. The opposite is parallel to P4Q through P2, the rest is easy.
Part 3 (Proof): It's almost obvious that the constructed square is the required one.
Part 4 (Details): There are 2 ways to construct the point Q above (in each of both possible direction from P2), so in general, the problem will have 2 solutions, but, if Q ≡ P4 above, the solutions will be infinitely many (e.g. if P1P2P3P4 is a square - as shown on the picture).
The above assumes P1 and P3 to be on opposite sides of the square, otherwise we obtain 2*3 = 6 solutions /or, eventually infinitely many/.
2007-12-06 05:48:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Duke 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, it is possible. In fact, the question can be more general than that. The points can be one on each side or an extension of that side.
Here is a link to the Math Forum - Ask Dr. Math, which answers the question and provides a diagram.
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/54675.html
2007-12-06 05:07:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Northstar 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
yeh, pick the mid points of each side, u can do
connect 2 opposite points to make a cross and measure from what point the lines cross and end. then at the end of the line draw half of a whole line (distance u just measured) at 90 degrees from the adjacent line, repeat the same thing for all the line segments.
2007-12-06 04:13:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by S K 2
·
0⤊
2⤋