If you could, give 2 reasons. Thanks
2007-12-05 16:43:24 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
A later court may cite a dissenting opinion if a case it is deciding is somewhat different from the actuall SC precedent.
2007-12-05 16:48:39 · answer #1 · answered by baystreet690 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dissenting opinions do carry some value in the form of persuasive authority.
If it is a Court of Appeals decision, the Supreme Court may choose to adopt the dissenting opinion if the majority of that court find the dissenting opinion more appropriate.
2007-12-05 16:55:52 · answer #2 · answered by Andy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dissents give us an insight into the deliberations and discussions engaged in by the Court. They also offer arguments which may be used to in the future when seeking a reversal as well as helping us to predict how a particular justice may rule in future cases. Plus, it is useful to know that the Court itself is sometimes conflicted, just as our society is itself.
2007-12-05 16:50:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To explain that they disagree with the majority, and to explain why.
Some of the most important rulings in US jurisprudence have been based on dissenting opinions in earlier cases.
Richard
2007-12-05 16:46:51 · answer #4 · answered by rickinnocal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A higher court may adopt it if it rejects the majority opinion.
It may be overturned at a later date.
But most importantly, just for peace of mind.
2007-12-05 17:13:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Don't look at me, I didn't do it"
2007-12-05 16:48:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋