have dog eat dog attitudes, are more cold blooded in their answeres when it comes to helpin out less fortunate human beings???!!!
2007-12-05 15:30:39 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
come on, grow up!!!
youre daddy bush is rapin the less fortunate (like barbara bush calls em)
hes throwin money around like candy over in the middle east evil empire fantasy war to corrupt contracters that they hired, while TRUE Americans,
disabled Veterans are gettin screwed!!!
no youre just throwing youre money away while Americans that should be gettin health care, and funds for our infrastructure are being used for the military empire being built and for the elite rich all have been prospering from this war!!!
2007-12-05 15:54:23 · update #1
youre tellin me there are no republican
criminals in prison, no republican social workers, you people have really stamped labels and sterotyped just like i did in this question!!!
some of you might stop and think about it, most probably not!!!
just like bush said yesterday "why thats phsycology 101"!!!
2007-12-05 16:06:20 · update #2
That's how they're!
You know the way i look at it, from an individual point of selection, if one feels deep down that, he/she is a cold blooded, selfish, prejudice and egotistical racist, SO he/she would select Rep's!!
It's just a common sense and daily observations!
2007-12-05 16:24:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I have no theory. I supported John Kerry only considering the fact that he became into powerfuble to weigh down every person in the debates. Howard Dean got here off as form of loopy. The Evangelicals will frequently help Hillary get elected in the event that they run a third occasion candidate (that's what they are threatening to do if Rudy wins the nomination). Ron Paul could have not got any probability by means of actuality that he's now no longer even a Republican, he's a Libertarian. united statesa. won't in any respect elect a eco-friendly occasion candidate or a Libertarian for the clarification that they are too severe. i don't recognize why Dennis Kucinich (a socialist) maintains on strolling thinking the reality that he additionally won't in any respect have a probability. i think John Kerry could've had a probability if people did no longer fall for those Swiftboat commercials. any individual could've smeared whoever the Democratic nominee became into. Bush beat John McCain by means of actuality that of smear campaigns. you does no longer ought to lie lots approximately Guiliani on account that he already has various inner maximum subject concerns his opposition can use in the direction of him.
2016-10-10 09:08:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have to think about the difference between what a person wants the government to do versus what a person will do by themselves. I find that those who do not want the government to help out others are far more willing to help those people themselves
2007-12-05 15:48:42 · answer #3 · answered by Matt W 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not really.
Helping others is best done on a personal level. Getting the govn't to hi-jack my income for purposes of redistribution, and taking a cut for the administration, - is not the "best" help for society.
Think about it, - since the 1960's, for all the govn't recipients, on the dole, they have babies that need MORE assistance as the generations continue. Does this sound like 'help'??
And the list includes
Social workers, - teaching mothers how to 'parent'
High school drop-out rates.
No father at home
drug rehabs and dealing
murder rates
law inforcement
prisons
2007-12-05 15:33:43 · answer #4 · answered by MK6 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Wow , I am sorry you hate Republicans so much. A lot of us support Ron Paul, many more have left the Republican Party to join the Libertarian party which advocates Low taxes and limited government two traditional conservative ideas not neo con ideas though they have hijacked our party
2007-12-05 16:11:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
yes thats their excuse for a philosophy they think they earned the sliver spoon in their mouth and its their birthright to whack anyone else with it
Liberials are smart enough to know that 99% of us will never benefit from bush policy unless we hit powerball and invest in haliburton
2007-12-05 16:09:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Not really.
But it all boils down to what you consider "less fortunate human beings." I don't consider an able-bodied persons who can work, but instead sit around eating bon-bons while watching daytime TV on our dime, as "less fortunate."
With so many opportunities in this great country, the only excuses for being poor is sheer laziness, mental illness, physical disabilities, or mentally handicap. Otherwise, no one is poor on accident.
2007-12-05 15:36:44 · answer #7 · answered by Karma 4 · 4⤊ 5⤋
they follow the golden rule.
they do unto others before the others get smart.
too bad the others are the entire country.
2007-12-05 15:59:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I want to decide how much to give and who it goes to. Letting a bunch of Democrats decide how best to spend my money isn't one of my favorite ideas. But by all means let them take your money.
2007-12-05 15:40:56 · answer #9 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
yes, there are 2 types of repubs, the rich who want to keep all their $$$ and the dupes who buy into the conservative "values"
2007-12-05 15:34:24 · answer #10 · answered by magpie 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋