I'm totally confused. It seems each candidate gives elusive answers that answer no questions. None of them give a direct answer, but an answer designed to satisfy the question in a general manner. Is it that they are all liars? Is it finally time to evolve into the next world order by rising up and cutting the wheat from the chaff with the guillotine? For those of you at Homeland Security, do you know what the word "facetious" means? Probably not. You are a brainwashed Christian Republican with no classical education.
2007-12-05 14:21:22 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
It's called pandering, and yes, it is deceiving. Someone, like that lunatic huckabee, will act like he doesn't base his every waking decision on his crazy religious beliefs. This is to trick non-theists into thinking he is genuine. But I guarantee that when he get's into office, he'll hang a cross on the front door and open hunting season on atheists, muslims, etc.
Besides, you have to look beyond the illusion of the popular vote, the vote they try to get you to participate in. The electoral college actually chooses the president, so don't believe the voting hype. If no one voted, we would still have a president.
2007-12-05 14:28:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People who answer "Barack Obama. He is totally cute" should not be able to vote if they are even of age. Regardless of if he is a good candidate. It's not reassuring to know there are these type of people voting in the decision of who is our next President.
2007-12-05 14:33:15 · answer #2 · answered by what were you expecting? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Regis Philbin
2007-12-05 14:43:33 · answer #3 · answered by gherd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a stable mom/woman does no longer enable considered one of those mess in her domicile and each guy has a fabulous variety of girls human beings around him GWB & Condolezza Rice; Clinton: Janet Reno & Madelyn Albright. Its no longer only the lads's fault if a woman helps Monica Lewinsky (yet another woman) to ensue innovations-blowing below her nostril.
2016-10-10 09:02:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul?
2007-12-05 14:25:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No body running for office is worth a damn...we are all in trouble for the next five yrs, one of Bush boy and who ever else gets in and forgets all of their promises...
2007-12-05 14:29:35 · answer #6 · answered by Joel H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone, except Hillery. If she gets elected, I'm moving to Canada.
2007-12-05 14:26:32 · answer #7 · answered by sarizmendez19 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hilary clinton due to the simple fact that were in such a deficate and that bill clinton got us a surplus so his wife may be able to do the same
2007-12-05 14:29:48 · answer #8 · answered by ineedacar 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barack Obama. He is totally cute.
2007-12-05 14:27:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
obama
2007-12-05 14:39:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋