English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have gotten numerous responses to this whole BCS thing with Hawaii and I must say that most of them were ignorant only because they keep repeating the same thing....weak schedule. How weak was OSU's schedule if they barely beat Michigan who lost to APP STATE??? People are saying Hawaii escaped at La Tech bla bla bla. The solution is so simple but no one listens. 11 conferences...take the winner of each conference and have them play the 2-3 extra games needed in the playoff's I mean geeze there is only 51 days until the BCS title game so I think there is time to "squeeze" it in. Did the BCS computer figure out that South Florida would shut down WV or that LSU would lose to KU? OSU to Illinois? No because it was figured out on the field and no computer can EVER predict who the better team is. It all boils down to money ratings and sponsors. It is all about who they think people want to see play rather than who should play. I AM NOT A HAWAII FAN but a fan of fair-play and not politics.

2007-12-05 13:52:34 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

2 answers

I not a Hawaii fan either, however Colt Brennan deserves the heisman a lot more then Tim Tebow and Hawaii being 12-0 needs to be in the BCS Title Game against Ohio State.

Hawaii will win the Sugar Bowl and Brennan will win the Heisman because they are that good GO WARRIORS.

2007-12-05 19:47:44 · answer #1 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 0 0

In light of Hawaii's 12-0 record I have come to the conclusion that the BCS computer is deathly frightened of the "Haka". LOL!
I agree that the BCS should be a series of games played by the conference winners. And I also think the Rose Bowl should go back to being a game between the Pac-10 and Big Ten conference champs.

2007-12-05 23:42:49 · answer #2 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers