2007-12-05 13:38:29 · 12 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not fast enough for me.
It's amazing that a professed communist (in nationalization ideas, not name) is a favorite of the libs. Socialist fools.
2007-12-05 14:05:23 · answer #1 · answered by Freedom Guy 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Hillary campaign lacks concentration. No coherent message, no coherent orators, only merchandising and marketing. The syncophants for Hillary push aside Oprah's clout yet humorous that the previous crones of yesterdays Clinton administration have moved to the Obama camp. I observed alot of gray hair in Oprah's convocation. it is the middle of the Democrat party. The kooks are backing Edwards and flying saucers guy. The hacks are backing the Clintonistas. that isn't the coronation Hillary replaced into searching for.
2016-12-17 08:37:56 · answer #2 · answered by vallee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It won't crumble, I;m hoping B.O. wins Iowa just so we can see all the great info Hillary has on him. Picture a cornered tiger and that will be Hillary if B.O. wins Iowa. Great entertainment ahead.
2007-12-05 13:50:31 · answer #3 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton has more money than any candidate, and she is leading in all of the national polls, so I would say she is in it for the long haul.
However Barack Obama is leading in Iowa and South Carolina, and he is closing ground in New Hampshire and Michigan.
If Obama can somehow win New Hampshire, then he has a chance to defeat her. I don't think it will happen, but it is a possibility.
2007-12-05 13:48:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think she expects to win Iowa. It will be too soon to pull out and she will win some states, there is no doubt about it. I think she is in this for the long haul.
2007-12-05 13:43:58 · answer #5 · answered by Robert S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That all depends on the liberal media, led by NYtimes. They may be setting her up to look like she has been "picked on, cause I'm a girl." If they use that, and it works, Iowa doesn't matter any more. It is not about Iowa. It's about the media. In 2000 they didn't want AlGore in the white house, so they got rid of him. Same with Kerry in '04.
________________________________________
KrazyKyngeKorny(Krazy, not stupid)
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
2007-12-05 13:57:46 · answer #6 · answered by krazykyngekorny 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
She can lose Iowa and still win.
2007-12-05 13:56:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I doubt she'll lose Iowa.
She will be the next President.
And Bill will be the nation's First Ladies' Man
2007-12-05 13:42:51 · answer #8 · answered by Tony Y 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think after Iowa, hillary will be history
2007-12-05 13:43:37 · answer #9 · answered by Mary Jo W 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it will be a big hit... if it happens... and I'm no fan, so I wouldn't be sad...
NOW THE KEY IS... how will she react...
if she can keep cool... she may be ok...
if she loses it and goes "YEAHAHAWWW" like Dean did... she's done...
2007-12-05 13:46:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋