Look at how effective those signs are in the malls that ban guns. I'm thinking if that's so effective, I should do this and no one will break in? Is that a great idea or what?
2007-12-05 13:36:45 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No
key word here is criminals
How many places will stop a criminal with a sign?
This only works for people that obey the law.
If I am a criminal and I have an objective the last thing that would stop me would be a sticker on a glass door or a sign in your front yard courthouse etc
Consider this though, criminals have a small portion of common sense and street smarts, bear with me here,
Criminal walks by a house with the intent to rob, in the driveway he sees a truck. In the back of the truck is a dog box. In the back glass he sees a NRA sticker along with a gun rack.
A criminal is not looking for a challenge he is looking for a victim...an easy victim..if he were looking for a challenge he would be out somewhere working instead of taking the easy way out being a thief.
Now think of all the signs you can put in front of your house, on the back of your Volvo that will tell the criminal you are unarmed and an easy target.
But then again some of these criminals are idiots and a sign will not help. A better approach is to be prepared reguardless of the deterrents or invitations you have outside.
Waiting extended periods of time for the government to come to your rescue is ignorant. IMO a better approach is to be prepared to handle the situation yourself...if it comes to that.
I choose to protect my family and property as rule no. 1.
I choose not to be vulnerable during the time waiting on the government to get there.
Remember alot can happen in this time.
Are you prepared?
2007-12-05 14:59:32 · answer #1 · answered by Augur B 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
with the intention to quit the millers we first ought to quit the USDA from licensing those pup turbines! Yep, they are the agency this is meant to look into, verify for violations, and so on. Now, somewhat maximum pup turbines are actually not authorized by using all people. they are inspired by using organic greed. We handle those constantly in our section. and there is not any one to observe over the numerous "exterior breeders" that are everywhere. in case you shut one down they purely circulate the operation extra back into the county or greater rural components. we are maximum suitable served to coach individuals of the possibility they run while paying for a dogs or pup from those form of places. The well-being hazards to boot as socialization subject concerns that are basic with those dogs. They finally closed down the puppy save that replace into in the mall. we've a PetSmart which permits rescues to come back in and do adoptions. yet yet another lady right here has a heck of a breeding agency set up. a number of of proceedings approximately sickly puppies or falsified pedigrees. we've made super advancements with the community subject. Breeders who needed to correctly known the thank you to greater desirable shield the dogs. asked the thank you to strengthen their set up. Retiring the breeding pairs lots before. Breeding the girls people much less. each so often it takes a cooperative attempt to relatively make a distinction. a number of those people do exactly no longer know greater desirable or how somewhat they could replace issues to make existence nicer for the dogs. some purely recover from their head and unexpectedly have too many dogs to shield proper. this is while a efficient rescue desires to furnish to help get issues below administration. seize greater flies with honey!
2016-10-19 08:29:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. If I was to rob a house I would rob the house w/ the sign just to show him up.
On the other hand a sign might be intimidating because it might imply that you are peticularly vigilant.
2007-12-05 13:50:02 · answer #3 · answered by Maddie 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If I was going to rob a house and you had a sign like that, I would view it as a challenge, so you'd be the first house I'd burgle.
2007-12-05 13:46:03 · answer #4 · answered by Robert S 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To the contrary. They will assume a real doofus is inside and they will tend to rush in immediately. That sign will just say "easy pickings" to them.
A rhetorical question and, of course, that will not stop them. Like the signs on the Mexican border that warn emigrating Mexicans to stop. (You must have some particular group in mind?)
2007-12-05 13:44:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
a better sign would say,....."this house protected by a man with a shot gun, 5 days and nights a week, you guess the days",.....
2007-12-05 14:01:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The signs are there in response to many citizens who have "right to carry permits" its to let them know they do not have that right on said premises.
2007-12-05 13:41:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who allows anyone to rob their house?
Robbery itself is against your will.
2007-12-05 13:41:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
And, because of the signs in the mall, people keep their gun concealed. Works fine, doesn't it?
I prefer the sign that says,
Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
People ignore signs, but not guns.
"My gun is the gun you can't ignore."
________________________________________
KrazyKyngeKorny(Krazy, not stupid)
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
2007-12-05 14:05:20 · answer #9 · answered by krazykyngekorny 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Here's a sign that WILL work. "Robbers will be shot on sight."
Let's hear it for the 2nd Amendment!
2007-12-05 13:59:35 · answer #10 · answered by Freedom Guy 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋