The Neo-Cons behind the Bush Regime have consistently endorsed making war against Iran. So when an Iran ruled by a moderate approached the US for talks in 2003, Bush turned them down - and THEN Iran elected the nutjob Ahmadinejad, the current president.
Now it looks like Bush intends to attack Iran before his term ends, regardless of national sentiment, the facts about Iran's non-existent nuclear weapons program, or even the limits of the Constitution.
Do YOU agree that George W. Bush should be allowed to commit America to yet another Middle East war just because he's "the decider" without congressional or national support?
2007-12-05 13:32:06 · 13 answers · asked by Der Lange 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is the lead subject on conservative and neutral news programs all day. The Bush position on Iran could cost Hillary Clinton the Democratic nomination. Bush backers are in complete denial. This MATTERS. NOT IN MY NAME, NOT AGAIN, this country won't make unjust war on a foundation of lies yet again!
2007-12-05 13:38:35 · update #1
Oh, this is GOOD. The Bush Deniers are out in FORCE - the lies are documented, the damage Bush has done around the globe is evident, the SOLDIERS DON'T WANT TO DO THIS, and the GENERALS SAY BUSH IS CRAZY. More than 76% of the nation does not back Bush. The war on Iraq was launched on a justification of lies and manipulations - and the entire country does NOT support it now.
2007-12-05 13:41:29 · update #2
Oh, the spin-meisters now even say the NIE does NOT say what it says, that we just don't understand, and that the authors of it are secret spies of anti-Bush forces.
ADMIT IT, LIARS. YOU GOT CAUGHT AND WE WON'T HELP YOU AGAIN.
2007-12-05 13:43:45 · update #3
Oh, now ONe person has aped the Bush "My way or the highway" position. You people refuse to admit that Iraq was NOT A THREAT TO AMERICAN SECURITY. You refuse to admit that Bush BLEW IT IN AFGHANISTAN. You refuse to admit that the bush Regime's incompetence CAUSED greater trouble after the conquest of iraq and created terrorism against the people there. BUSH IS THE REASON AMERICA IS IN DANGER FROM WORLDWIDE TERRORISTS NOW.
2007-12-05 14:10:15 · update #4
If Bush somehow takes us into yet another stupid war... I want him on the front lines with all the young people who will die. Him, Cheney the whole damn works of them. Put his girls and wife in there too... let him get a taste of what war really is.. let him lose a loved one.
It is easy to sit at your desk and move us around like puppets... but the coward in the White house never did a day of military fighting.. how would he know anything.
Enough is enough.. we will not let him do this to us again. he has taken one of my loved ones.. not ever another!
2007-12-05 14:06:50 · answer #1 · answered by Debra H 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i've got faith an attack on Iran has been the plan from the commencing up - that Iraq and Afghanistan have been invaded just to encircle Iran, and that the previous chilly Warriors in the Bush administration, consisting of Cheney and Rumsfeld, have been spoiling to take out the Islamic government of Iran ever by means of fact the Shah became into deposed. that should describe the lies advised to justify invading Iraq, and the extra well-known anti-Islamic rhetoric the administration has stealthily yet again and again disseminated considering the fact that 9/11. It additionally explains Bush's impervious innovations-set in the direction of public opinion right here at domicile, and why he has labored so stressful to maintain us from getting to understand the uncomplicated info of those White domicile emails. that's probable why Colin Powell left, and probable why lots of others are leaving the administration - they recognize the large one's coming.
2016-10-10 08:57:19 · answer #2 · answered by bettyann 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the newest NIE would seem to back the president's decision to employ sanctions and tough talk in addition to international pressure to solve the problem with Iran.I doubt seriously that either Gore or Kerry could have done it. The only people I see beating the drums for a war with Iran are Liberals. Why is that?
Dang, look at the reaction to the answers this guy is giving. I guess the truth does hurt. I just love the new spin hes putting on all this. When one lie doesn't work hes ready with something else.
2007-12-05 13:40:16 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
This guy shouldn't be allowed out in public, let alone run the bloody USA!
Voting in the democratic senate in should have stopped this BS from happening! It should have terminated the campaign in Iraq too, he is a lunatic!
2007-12-05 14:14:00 · answer #4 · answered by Judo Chop 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You said the entire country does not support our President.This alone means you are either misinformed on everything you say or,,,you are a liar.I support my countries leaders on the simple fact that they have more info than is given to the public and really , no matter what they do it will be in our countries best interest.You have no way to prove otherwise except when we are attacked here at home again.Then you will say our leaders failed us again or that we attacked our self again.In other words,,,there is no way to please a person like you.So,,,either get with the program,,,or get out.Your choice.
2007-12-05 13:54:59 · answer #5 · answered by Ronboy 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋
when did bush ever say we were going to attack iran???? you have a quote or somthing to base YOUR lies on??? all option have been on the table, they remain on the table, national intelligence assessment is just the newest one, the one before that determined they DID have a weapons program...WHAT ELSE IS BUSH TO DO BUT TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, WHICH HE DID!! NOW, THEY CHANGED THEIR TUNE, AND YOU ACT LIKE BUSH SOMEHOW KNEW MORE THAN ALL THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY AND WAS SOMEHOW SUPPOSED TO KNOW...HOW LUDICROUS IS THAT??? DO YOU THINK BEFORE YOU TYPE WHAT COMES INTO YOUR HEAD??? FOR INSTANCE, WHY DO YOU THINK THIS ASSESSMENT IS ANY BETTER THAN THE LAST ONE WHICH THEY NOW SAY IS WRONG? WHAT IF THEY'RE WRONG NOW? HEY DUMMY!!!! BUSH JUST GOT THIS INFORMATION LAST WEEK. OK??? OK SHMUCKY???
2007-12-05 13:45:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Wow; he never went to war yet without congressional support - or national support either. If you bother to look at history you will note that congress (both house and senate) voted to go to war and that public opinion polls in the US supported the decision too. Shocking what a does of reality hits you with I know.
2007-12-05 13:35:48 · answer #7 · answered by netjr 6 · 4⤊ 7⤋
anything bush wants to do i'm against it because he is a damn lier
2007-12-05 13:45:41 · answer #8 · answered by moe 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
i just would like it to get started cause its goin happen. the establishment is just lookin for a suitable reason the general public will buy.
2007-12-05 13:42:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Your Bush Derangement Syndrome is showing.
2007-12-05 13:36:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 8⤋