Bush Cherry picked them to invade Iraq. Cheney exposed a CIA agent to intimidate them. The Bush admin scapegoated them after cherry picking their intel and ignoring their warnings.
Why is Bush and his supporters so disrespectful of US intelligence agencies?
2007-12-05 13:14:45 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't think they were cherry-picked at all. The President (and a whole lot of Democrats with convenience of memory disease) believed them about WMDs in Iraq. The President Believed them about yellowcake in Niger until they backtracked on that one, and now the geniuses in the intelligence community (who were probably all Clinton appointees) are trying to tell us that Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapons system program when they're making heavy water, which is only applicable to weapons production. Lets face it, it the democrats who're doing the cherry-picking, and not only with the intelligence apes (who also said that North Korea didn't have nukes), but with their own speeches when clearly Howard Dean, John Kerry, both Criminal Clintons, Boxer, Pelosi and Hairplugs Biden all stated for the record that Saddam had WMDs and was going to use them. Chi Guy, you got to tell the truth sooner or later, why no do so now?
2007-12-05 13:36:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Even though i am a supporter i think the TV supporters are trying to move away the mistakes that Bush has made and blame them on the Intelligence agencies trying to move the blame from him to them!.
Love ya Chi...
2007-12-05 13:25:05 · answer #2 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well if we don't start another war,
Now how are they going to be war profiteers
Oil prices will fall... Like the 12 bucks that it fell in the last 10 days.
You have to keep the rhetoric up so you can keep day trading and make money on oil futures!!!
It would be interesting to see just WHO shorted Oil futures prior to the NIE caming out!!!!
2007-12-05 13:25:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
because it makes them experience better efficient for being incorrect in electing for a 2d time their loser of a President GWB! he's anti- at properly the following: American youngster's well being Care, Civil Rights, Gun administration, increasing the minimum salary, Citizen variety, undesirable human beings, Balanced buget, Minorities, Homosexuals, vote casting Rights,significant social classes, loose Speech, and Prosperity. None of which makes any experience, basically as he's professional- at properly the following: lack of life penalty, conflict( even if if the rustic we are combating hasn't ever attacked us or is shown to be of no danger), Racism( Has no time table for promoting race relations or upholding the civil rights of minorities, undergo in concepts the Jena 6 case and the Katrina victims! He also spoke at Bob Jones college this is a widespread racist employer yet change into refusing to communicate before the NAACP this is a company depending by ability of both Blacks and Whites to uphold Justice.), Torture, and Disingenuousness! If any of those so-observed as Conservative Leaders on the following had a CEO in a employer that they owned who led to a promoting and marketing conflict with yet another employer that they could no longer win that lasted for 7 years and fee the employer 1000000000000 money without revenue being made, lied about their dealings continuously, employed persons that were no longer qualified to fill positions and missed those that were qualified, replied very poorly to employer disaster, led to easily about a million human beings to be terminated for no identifiable reason, had no inventive and prescient for the employer, illegally wire-tapped each and each of the employer places of paintings, and in a roundabout way leaked substantial inner most advice to significant competition, might want to he nonetheless be operating for that employer? What might want to you do to him? this isn't some thing yet "undesirable administration" at it very fantastic! Sounds so very like our modern-day President do not you imagine???akes them experience better efficient for being so incorrect about their failure of a President GWB!
2016-10-26 13:24:17 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean the same one that told us that Iraq had WMD's,and all the liberals and the alphabet soup news[?] agencies butchered them for their report.
So now they come out with a report from 4 yrs. ago saying Iran stopped their Nuke program? and their the darlings of the same worthless drive by media.
Please....give me a break. It doesn't pass the stink test.
2007-12-05 13:53:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because the Findings Contradict their (Neo-Con) Predilections?
2007-12-05 13:55:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What?! You actually expect Bush supporters to discuss and debate the issues instead of just issuing rhetoric and questioning the patriotism of their opponents?
2007-12-05 13:18:55 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
because all bush supporters really can do is attack the messanger.
there is literally nothing that they can do or say to prop up their continued war on the truth.
but that has never stopped them before - it won't now.
what it all really confirms to me is that our president and his advisors LIED us into the iraq war.
2007-12-05 13:22:00 · answer #8 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It all depends on your point of view.
Bush and his buddies have been hammered for years by the media, dems, and other assorted leftists over the original Intelegence reports over the alledged WMD in Iraq.
Now you guys want the administration to approve of this report on WMD in Iran??????
I think you libs finally got what you wanted all along.
Bush is rejecting the intelegence communities report!!
Whadda ya want?
2007-12-05 13:22:04 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
I expect you won't get many replies on this one.
2007-12-05 13:19:32 · answer #10 · answered by Alex G 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋