USA bombing the crap out of Baghdad on live tv took out two other threats beside the Hussein family. What an extremely great military action.
2007-12-05 11:48:36 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Excellent point! The lib's don't like you to say this though I'm sure!
2007-12-05 11:50:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I constantly concept that being sane became such as being pregnant. You the two are in any different case you're no longer. i'm unsure how the "solely" suits in right here. i could want to tell you that i think of it shows he's insane, yet that does no longer be the actuality. The Bush administration has, in view that 911, operated effectively on the foundation of inspiring concern. This premise contributed to the knee-jerk reaction of the congress in helping and passing the "patriot act" and it has labored fantastically plenty for them/him in view that then. Now he's caught in an embarassing concern. at present he defined that he were advised somewhat some months in the past that there became some new intel, yet that it mandatory to be appeared at for accuracy, and that he became purely given this wisdom various days in the past. ok, so as which skill whilst the President is advised that there is a few new (which skill 'diverse') intel, he does not ask for a minimum of a cursory evaluate? Who interior the worldwide will have self belief that! So now, as a infant-kisser is obligated to do, he tries to spin this around to make it sound like...yeah, that's what i've got been sayin all alongside." it is pathetic and it is embarrassing to every person with a million/2 a techniques. although, i think of the yank public's unbelievable gullibility makes human beings like George Bush have self belief they are able to declare something and the human beings will have self belief it. So possibly the greater clever question is that this: Are individuals regularly no longer solely sane?
2016-12-30 08:23:38 · answer #2 · answered by oloto 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would Iran halt their nuclear programs after bombing Iraq? That makes no sense since there is no connection or proof of connection. Iran knew that they wouldn't be attacked because the U.S didn't have enough troops for Iraq alone. They would have needed 10 times the troops sent to Iraq if they were going to invade Iran. Iran knew we didn't have the troops. Perhaps if Bush stuck to terrorism and attacking those entities that actually had something to do with terrorism rather than diverting our trillions of dollars to Iraq for the oil, there would be alot more cooperation in the middle east from all countries including pakistan. But as it stands, bush is failing in Iraq AND Afghanistan now.
2007-12-05 12:13:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The missleading about the invasion of Iraq, was the OIL
only, The libyans are rich of Oil , and the USA is looking for oil and they will go far from war to friendship and relations becasue there is not any moral motiving in invasion Iraq
2007-12-08 04:38:27 · answer #4 · answered by haiseb 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People are unbelievable. This report changes nothing. Right now Iran is trying to enrich uranium. What good is a nuke program if you can't enrich uranium? So they put the program on the back burner. If they gain the ability to enrich uranium, they can restart their nuke program again. The report goes on to say that Iran could get nuke capabilities in the next 3-7 years. Hello!! That is not that far away. That will be during the next president's tenure, especially if they are a 2 term president.
2007-12-05 11:50:55 · answer #5 · answered by Dude 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you really think they halted their programs,then why does Iran....
1. Have so many centrifuges(and still building more)
2. placed the missle establishments,knocked out by Isreal in Syria,that had Nuclear material from North Korea?
I believe we havent heard the last of it,and the people and Nations that all declared that Iraq had WMD"s(and I still believe they moved them to neighboring countries) said Saddam had them,now their saying Iran stopped their Nuclear program?How did they get their information this time?
2007-12-05 11:58:15 · answer #6 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Well it is an interesting coincidence that 2003, the year Iran shut down it's program is the same year Bush went after Iraq. And all the Libs like Sen. Reed are making this report out to be anti-Bush, but I have to agree with you, it looks like Iran was scared straight by President Bush's actions against Iraq.
2007-12-05 11:52:28 · answer #7 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Anyone that believes Iran is not working for a nuclear weapon fools himself. There are still sites in Iran inspectors are not allowed to go into.
Israel has the best intelligence over there, and they will take action when they believe it's necessary.
2007-12-05 11:53:03 · answer #8 · answered by mysterian 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
It did stop at the same time and likely had an effect...... on the flip side N Korea has also stopped its program, N Korea was accomplished by diplomacy that didnt require the death of a single US soldier......If its up to me....same results.....how bout we try diplomacy first and keep our boys home
2007-12-05 11:56:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Didn't Bush recently say that he didn't want to bomb Bagdad, but the Democrats pushed him into it?
I guess it's a good thing they did.
2007-12-05 11:50:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Shock and Awe them he did........ and then he flew that infamous MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner......that really scared em..
I think most of us are still shocked and awed that we are still in Iraq after all these years'''''''''''''
I didnt even know Libya was a player........ I think we are trade partners with them now.......
nice spin though
2007-12-05 12:15:36 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋