was it inevitable that the north would win the civil war?

Answer 1

Probably, the North was more industrialized, they had better/more weapons, equipment, and medicine, and more soldiers.

However, as with most wars, they are fought in specific battles, specific places and times. Military leaders and strategy have a great deal to do with warfare. Making the right strike and the right time with the right force is how battles are won. You win enough battles and you win the war. You can find details about the good and bad things a particular military leader did and see how the battle was won or lost.

The South had hoped for assistance but never received any.

Answer 2

No. The South was winning most major battles in the beginning of the war, and former General MacClellan (spelling may be wrong) ran against Lincoln on a peace platform. Had he won the election, the South may have won their independence. Until Grant, the South had the best major generals. The North couldn't find a good general to lead their main army, the Army of the Potomac. But one of the big things about Gettysburg, and there are many, is that it helped give the North some optimism about the war, and helped Lincoln get re-elected. Lincoln wasn't going to give up keeping the Union whole, and Grant came in and competently ran the army just after Gettysburg.

Answer 3

TG has got it right. It was NOT inevitable that that the North would win. Despite the North's advantages in population and industrial capability, had the South been successful in inducing Great Britain or France to intercede on their behalf the War's outcome would have been drastically different.

Answer 4

The north had a much better business means and bigger than double the inhabitants of the south, and of this inhabitants all were loose human beings waiting to make contributions to the conflict. though, the south gained each and each of the early battles contained in the conflict. this is troops were better efficient prepared and the southern lifestyle inspired being sturdy combatants and marksmen better than the north's lifestyle did. This change into partly because the inhabitants of the south change into better rural, and also because in order to save the slaves in line white southerners had to be able to implement their domination on occasion. The south and the north also had diverse objectives. The south change into no longer exciting in conquering the north - in basic terms in protecting the northerners out. The armies of the north had a larger pastime because they had to retake all that territory that had seceded. So from the southerner's perspective it looked like that they had a sturdy danger to win. and they could have, if the north were ruled by ability of someone who change into squeamish and didn't want to pursue a conflict even as it grew to change into too expensive. The southerner's wish might want to were that once some quick victories the north might want to were compelled into acknowledging that the fee change into too extreme to carry the south lower back into the Union. And it change into very, very extreme. the ranges of drafting the north change into compelled to undertake many times led to riots and unrest. A lesser president may have appeared at this stuff and determined that he might want to stay with the southern states being area of a separate united states of america. this style of president might want to have made peace with the south and lengthy gone his personal way. The leaders of the south must have change into hoping this can ensue. yet Lincoln change into unwilling to settle for some thing decrease than the completed resign and reconquest of the south. even although the north's losses were a lot larger than the south's, Lincoln refused to allow any slackening of the conflict attempt. Northern victory change into certainly inevitable, yet in basic terms because the north change into keen to do even if change into needed, although lengthy it took, to envision a finished victory. Had Lincoln been a diverse type of individual this is particularly available that he may have given up and allowed the south to bypass their personal way.

Answer 5

No, it was very possible that the South could have dragged out the war long enough to make it so costly for the North that the North may have given up.

Answer 6

yes! the north had about 80-90% of all industry, workforce, supporters of war living in territorys, help from blacks, money, bank deposits and railroads
the only problem they ran in to was unknow lands in the south and the south had more morality due to their cause!

if you need more help on the civil war and causes anwser 1 of my questions telling me so and i would be glad to help!

Answer 7

From the beginning, southern leaders knew their only hope was intervention from abroad. They approached a number of foreign powers, but put their greatest hopes in Britain, which was teh major importer of Southern cotton. When foreign assistance failed to materialize, they were doomed.

Answer 8

YES! The North had all the resources and weapons. They had the people with the military training.

Answer 9

no. the south would never had won, but they could have not lost if lee hadn't have pushed into the north. all they needed was to fight a defensive war. they also killed their cause with stupid economic and trade desicions.

Answer 10

Yes. The Confederacy had no industrial manufacturing base to speak of.