2007-12-05 11:33:39 · 14 answers · asked by ღOMGღ 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
That stupidity should be banned. It's not the guns that cause the damage, but it is the idiots behind them that need to be regulated.
2007-12-05 11:38:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Gun control only succeeds in taking guns out of the law abiding citizens' hands. The criminals don't get their guns legally anyway, so it doesn't even affect them. It makes their lives easier because they are the ones with all the guns.
How many people are killed by cars every year? Should cars be outlawed because some fools use them to kill? Of course not. Just because of a small majority of idiots our RIGHTS should not be taken away. While these fools get the air time for killing sprees, there are millions of gun owners out there who don't do this, but we don't hear about them. How many gun owners save lives? Those stories don't get the big news either. It's easier to just lump all gun owners in as trigger happy mutants.
What is an unarmed citizen called? A subject! The Second Amendment was created for a very real purpose.
2007-12-05 11:46:49 · answer #2 · answered by Gretchen316 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am a firm believer in the phrase "Guns dont kill people. People kill people." I would also like to state that people were killing people long before guns. Look at the movie BraveHeart. They were using effing deer antlers! I bet if Hatchets were all the rage, everyone would be anti-hatchet.
When Clinton passed the laws that prohibited the purchase of certain street sweepers, he did nothing about the cheap 9mm and 22s that kids could easily get their hands on. Tell me, what High School kid is going to easily get their hands on a 3,000 gun? Ok, now what kid will be able to get their hands on a cheap $100 9mm? Right, guess what. You can still easily buy that cheap 9mm, but gun collectors arent able to buy certain guns to add to their collection because they are "dangerous". Im not knocking Clinton, because I liked him....I just didnt agree with his views on Gun Control.
You asked.
2007-12-05 11:41:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
The only kind of gun control I need is the control I have when it is in my hand!
A crackhead wouldn't think twice about coming into your house if he knew you didn't have any guns in your house!
2007-12-05 13:36:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree that Gun Control is using both hands, but it's also hitting what you aim at!
2007-12-05 11:40:36 · answer #5 · answered by Brian V 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Gun control won't prevent criminals and crazies who go out and massacre people from getting guns. If they want them, they'll find a way to get them.
2007-12-05 11:42:59 · answer #6 · answered by JoGirl 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why have guns in the fist place?
People often say that they need guns to "protect themselves" but it seems that people who get shot are shot by guns that weren't "protecting" anyone.
Cheers from Australia
2007-12-05 11:49:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thats a tough situation. I think that guns should be illegal actually because people only use them for worng but then guns can kill food like deer and stuff like that. I personally dont like them.
2007-12-05 11:39:45 · answer #8 · answered by Lanieღ•° 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
gun control is a mute point here in america there are to many guns floating around , done is done
2007-12-05 11:47:39 · answer #9 · answered by psttt this is my main account 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think we need more strict gun control. It's very unfortunate what happens nowadays with guns winding up in the wrong hands.
LET'S WAKE UP AND LOBBY FOR STRICTER GUN CONTROL.
2007-12-05 11:40:52 · answer #10 · answered by Adel 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋