If Bush lied about Iraq, then Iran how you can be sure that he did not lie about 9/11?

Answer 1

Why don't you ask the family members of the victims? Where do you people get this stuff? You should spend your time in a much more productive way, like protesting the illegal alien invasion of our country or demanding the border be closed.

Answer 2

First Iraq did have WMD's, he used them on many occasions, against Iran and his own people, do you refute that?,and if Hussein had allowed the inspectors to do what they were supposed to do rather than playing a giant shell game with them the war most likely wouldn't have happened. Second they say Iran gave up it's nuke program but what they're saying mostly is they just really don't know now, their assessment was from 4 years ago, if they did why do they need 3000 centrifuges?, OK fine so they don't make an actual weapon all they have to do is one day announce " gee we don't know how it happened but we're missing a couple of tons of material", nudge,nudge,wink,wink, and the next thing you know dirty bombs are going of in Europe or the US or wherever, then what.

Answer 3

Bush took office in January 2001. Just prior to 9/11 his approval rating was 53%. He didn't need a terrorist attack to boost his popularity. As for lying about Iraq, (we're talking WMD's), it was Bill Clinton who initiated the need to take out Saddam and his WMD's. The Democrats supported and urged that we take out Saddam right up until they gave Bush approval to invade Iraq. When no WMD's were found, the Democrats developed selective memories and called Bush a liar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE
As for 9/11, the wheels were in motion years before Bush was elected president. Dry runs, flying lessons all took place during Clinton's time in office. One of the reasons Bush was not ready for 9/11 was lack of communication between intelligence agencies, thanks to Bill Clinton's Deputy Attorney General, Jamie Gorelick. After 9/11 Gorelick covered her butt by securing a seat on the 9/11 commission.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05226/553271.stm
One last thing, Bush was very clear that there was no direct connection between Saddam and 9/11.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/18/iraq/main584234.shtml

Answer 4

I am still waiting for any shred of Proof that Bush actually lied about Iraq instead of just being wrong.

And the conspiracy theory's that say Bush had anything to do with the attacks of 911 are nothing but fairy tales

Answer 5

Dumbya is yet uncaught as a "9/11" perp, and though he might have it otherwise for the rest of us, it is still innocent until proven guilty. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!

Answer 6

Actually 911 did happen, I'd hate to think that Dubya had any hand in it, other than being asleep at the wheel, and I'm no fan of him or his father. What he did after that is on him.

Answer 7

Because lying is not big deal. All politicians probably do it.

However, lying about 9/11 would mean he's a mass murderer.

Just because he lied somewhere doesn't mean he would committ mass murder.

Answer 8

Well he did oppose the 911 Commission investigation. On the other hand, I don't think Bush is intelligent enough to plan out something as complex as 911. I think he was just negligent.

Answer 9

Of course he lied and keep lying about 9/11.

Answer 10

since he didn't lie about Iraq or Iran, what makes you think he would lie about 9/11.