English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I thought that uncircumsized penis is nicely protected from bacterias when covered with foreskin.

2007-12-05 10:33:07 · 14 answers · asked by baywatch 3 in Health Men's Health

14 answers

No, you can have a perfectly clean uncircumcided penis if you just shower properly.

2007-12-05 10:48:22 · answer #1 · answered by Yun May Li 4 · 6 1

My son is two mo previous, i'm new at having a boy I easily have 2 women, yet he's circumsized. The gauze fell off after a pair of diaper adjustments and that i only wiped sparkling him as quickly as I replaced him. The widespread practitioner stated as long as there wasn't intense bleeding it could be high-quality. No baths for some days, purely showers with the intention to no longer soak the section. It became soft for a pair of week, yet now he's great.

2016-11-13 19:12:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Ignore surfny. He's been banned several times and had a bunch of different profiles. He has a fetish for circumcision and keeps posting that retarded essay by another circumcision fetishist Brian Morris.

Anyway, I agree with what others said: A penis is only as clean as the owner keeps it.

2007-12-05 14:35:56 · answer #3 · answered by SunkenShip 4 · 5 0

Not at all. If you wash your penis, it's clean, cut or intact. If you don't wash it, it'll get dirty, cut or intact. And yes, a foreskin protects your glans against any dirt or germs on your clothes or anyplace elsewhere you put your equipment, so if anything uncut is a little cleaner.

To answer Brian, an artcle in Reuters yesterday said that among American men, circumcision was found to offer NO protection against HIV/AIDS. http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSN0345545120071204

2007-12-05 10:46:59 · answer #4 · answered by Maple 7 · 5 0

Unless you don't take those 10 seconds to pull back and rub the head when you shower, it should be the same.

Many of the studies that originally found that circumcision would reduce AIDS/HIV were biased, inaccurate, and only done in Africa, which is completely different then the US or Europe:
http://www.circumstitions.com/HIV.html

A study that was just announced yesterday on MSNBC and Reuters found that a study in the United States found that circumcision does not protect American men and women from HIV or AIDS:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22096758/

Check out HIV statistics:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2155rank.html

As you can see, the United States (the industrialized nation with the highest circumcision rate, has the highest HIV rate). Most of Europe and Latin America (who don't circumcise) have lower rates.

In addition, another medical study found that prostitution, not circumcision (specifically mentioned in the conclusion) is what spreads HIV that much; that makes sense.
http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0000543

Circumcision has become less common. Circumcision rates were as high as 90% back in the 1960s and 1970s (that's partly why today's adults are so... brainwashed, I supposed you could say, about thinking that circumcision is better) but they have fallen to as low as 14% in some states. Here are the statistics:
http://www.cirp.org/library/statistics/USA/staterates2004/

The USA is the last developed nation doing it to a large number of newborns without religious or medical needs. (Europeans, Latin Americans, Japanese, and most Australians, Canadians, and Asians don't circumcise):
http://www.circumstitions.com/Maps.html

In a medical study, it was found that females are more likely to hit orgasm with an uncircumcised man:
http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html

The lubricated foreskin (on the inside... like your eyelids) slides up and down during sex and masturbation to stimulate the head (which is why you don't hear of uncircumcised guys needing lube to masturbate).
http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/
http://net.indra.com/~shredder/intact/anatomy/index.html

Studies have found that circumcision reduces sensitivity (this article also mentions how it has lost popularity in the USA in recent times):
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html

And despite being more sensitive, uncircumcised guys still last in the same six minute range (average) that circumcised guys do:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00070.x

Circumcision makes masturbation more difficult:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06646.x

Which makes sense, that's how circumcision was promoted in the USA:
http://english.pravda.ru/science/health/27-03-2006/77873-circumcision-0

Increases erectile dysfunction rates:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14979200&dopt=Abstract%7C

If too much skin is removed in circumcision, it can make the penis smaller since the penis needs some skin to expand during an erection:
http://drgreene.org/body.cfm?id=21&action=detail&ref=1125
http://www.altermd.com/Penis%20and%20Scrotal%20Surgery/buried_penis.htm

Circumcision does not completely stop penile cancer. The American Cancer Society has already confirmed the myth that circumcision = no cancer.
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_2X_Can_penile_cancer_be_prevented_35.asp

If circumcision did stop penile cancer, then penile cancer would not be more common in the USA (most circumcised adults) than in some European nations, where circumcision is not practiced other than for medical/religious reasons.
http://www.circumstitions.com/Cancer.html

2007-12-05 15:09:32 · answer #5 · answered by Jorge 7 · 3 1

the foreskin protects the head...also tends to make it more sensitive...but it DOES require thorough cleaning otherwise smegma can develop...leading to a whitish chunky cream with a really foul odor.

the circumcised penis has a cleaner "look"...but that's due to society's thoughts and opinions on the whole idea of circumcision.

2007-12-05 10:39:42 · answer #6 · answered by jambandfan99 2 · 5 0

BioEssays. 2007 Oct 12;29(11):1147-1158

Why circumcision is a biomedical imperative for the 21(st) century.

School of Medical Sciences and Bosch Institute, Building F13, The
University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

Circumcision of males represents a surgical "vaccine" against a wide
variety of infections, adverse medical conditions and potentially
fatal diseases over their lifetime, and also protects their sexual
partners. In experienced hands, this common, inexpensive procedure is
very safe, can be pain-free and can be performed at any age. The
benefits vastly outweigh risks. The enormous public health benefits
include protection from urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted
HIV, HPV, syphilis and chancroid, penile and prostate cancer,
phimosis, thrush, and inflammatory dermatoses. In women circumcision
of the male partner provides substantial protection from cervical
cancer and chlamydia. Circumcision has socio-sexual benefits and
reduces sexual problems with age. It has no adverse effect on penile
sensitivity, function, or sensation during sexual arousal. Most women
prefer the circumcised penis for appearance, hygiene and sex. Given
the convincing epidemiological evidence and biological support,
routine circumcision should be highly recommended by all health
professionals.

BioEssays 29:1147-1158, 2007. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PMID: 17935209 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/34201?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

2007-12-05 13:10:20 · answer #7 · answered by surfnyogadude 4 · 0 6

A penis is only as clean as the guy keeps it.

2007-12-05 10:38:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8 1

Actually, they have recently discovered that an uncircumciszed penis is three to four times more likely to contract the AIDS virus the a circumcised one.
So yes, circumcised is better.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/07/06/MNGANDJFVK1.DTL&type=printableL

2007-12-05 11:15:13 · answer #9 · answered by brian777999 6 · 1 6

Bacteria grows moreso in an uncircumcised penis because sweat and dirt build up more easily there. It also depends on how often you wash yourself.

2007-12-05 10:53:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 6

fedest.com, questions and answers