I am. I'll say it.
"There won't be another big bang before the universe dies."
2007-12-05 09:27:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by quantumclaustrophobe 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I agree, there would be an incredibly large detectable amount of mass coming together in the center of the universe, which there isn't.
Also, the fact that the universe is expanding would directly contradict the possibility of a second big bang, as all the matter in the universe would need to be coming together via gravitation, which it eventually will.
There will be a second "big bang", but it will be our universe crumpling up and "banging" again, not a new one coming to be.
2007-12-05 09:29:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by jordan_0_0_7 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Big Bangs" do not happen *in* universes. The Big Bang is the hot, dense state of the ENTIRE universe. the universe is expanding, and will continue to do so, and therefore will not return to a hot dense state. So I too, for two points, will say, "There won't be another big bang before our universe dies."
Note: Unobservable big bang states of other universes are not science.
2007-12-05 09:38:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by ZikZak 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There has been a proposed oscillatory model of the universe - it expands for some exceptionally long time, then it contracts - starting anew with another big bang - you and I will be long gone before that happens. If that were the case, our universe would end prior to the next big bang...
2007-12-05 09:59:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steve E 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
the two area and time began with the large Bang, so there became into no "in the previous". What makes you're saying that for the duration of the previous the large Bang, "won't be able to be no longer something"? Why no longer? Does the belief of "no longer something" frighten you or do you truly have faith that "no longer something" won't be able to exist? that's never an theory common to regulate intellectually, exceptionally from the perspective of Western technological understanding, however the Hindus do no longer look to have a fabulous variety of worry with it. Physicists have faith they could understand the methods that occured lower back to interior milliseconds of the Bang itself, in spite of the undeniable fact that it must be that we are going to in no way understand better than that. The pressures, temperatures, growth expenses, etc. are only innovations-boggling and could no longer be available to the medical approach and our measuring platforms. despite if i in my opinion am no longer a believer in a private god, the belief of the large Bang does no longer avert such an entity. honestly, i think of the persons who have faith that each and every observe of the Bible is incredibly real are restricting the opportunities of their god. Why positioned limits on what they think to be an omniscient, omnipresent, all-useful entity? that's alright to have faith in technological understanding AND god. Google "the large Bang" for a great number of hyperlinks to actual technological understanding. that's way cool. some hyperlinks are listed below.
2016-10-10 08:26:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by fenner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For two points I'll say it -- 'There won't be another big bang before our universe dies."
2007-12-05 09:30:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chug-a-Lug 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What if there is a second Big Bang and no one comes?
2007-12-05 09:49:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Faesson 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wish I could share quantumc...'s confidence. He may be right. Probably is. But I'd wonder how someone could be so sure.
Edit: re. Prof Zikzak's note: Thank you. I'm glad I'm not alone in that view.
2007-12-05 09:30:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brant 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are supposedly other big bangs happening all the time, just not in our universe.
brought to you by string theory
2007-12-05 09:32:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mercury 2010 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They might be happening all the time, we just can't see the results.
2007-12-05 09:29:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋