Yes, or no. Please think first.
2007-12-05 08:20:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Ebony and Premahol... so you have contradicted yourselves by both agreeing that it is not possible while at the same time doing so.
2007-12-05 08:26:57 · update #1
Mommyman: ah but that was not a simple no.
2007-12-05 08:27:39 · update #2
Gee: so you really can't but you've rationalized your failure away.
2007-12-05 08:29:53 · update #3
The Answer: bit of a sticky wicket isn't it - I asked for a 'simple' no.
2007-12-05 08:31:23 · update #4
X
2007-12-05 14:03:26 · answer #1 · answered by Sly Fox [King of Fools] 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-12-05 16:45:17 · answer #2 · answered by Willian - O Barão de Barcelos א 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It can, but I choose not to answer in that fashion. Your acceptance of my answer is not required.
[add] And you can't accept that it is still valid, apparently.
[2nd add] The answers is 'yes'. The question could be answered with a 'no' but it would not be the correct response.
[3rd add] Any more 1st year wordplay puzzles in your repertoire?
2007-12-05 16:26:10 · answer #3 · answered by Gee Whizdom™ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The answer to everything is 42! There is no such thing as a simple no, and I refuse to give you one :) Good question though
2007-12-05 17:24:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes it can be answered with a no.
My answer is yes then no
2007-12-05 16:25:49 · answer #5 · answered by mommymanic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes!
but its not a real question so the answer is no so the real answer is yes
2007-12-05 16:30:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps.
2007-12-05 16:36:13 · answer #7 · answered by Trina™ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2007-12-05 16:23:33 · answer #8 · answered by King of the blind 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-12-05 16:24:06 · answer #9 · answered by Premaholic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋