2007-12-05 07:32:17 · 15 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Its funny how Cons still want to believe the intell about Iraq. But now they don't want to listen to the intell about Iran!!!
Lots of the intell about Iraq said there was no threat but the WH and the Media choose to ignore it.
This is what happens when the WH hand picks its intell.
2007-12-05 08:18:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm not really sure. The NIE report didn't really say anything. Said Iran stopped working on getting nuclear power in 2003, but it says nothing of the intent to get nuclear power. Trust me the intent is still there. Just like the WMDs, they found a few little things. No real bombs or anything, but Suddam himself said he was sending out false intel that he had Nuclear capability. So to some, you can pick and choose what info you use to support your side. I think the dems will use it to there advantage as will the reps. Typical politicians. lol
2007-12-05 15:42:05 · answer #2 · answered by amber s 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You want to impeach Bush because he "lied" by believing the intelligence on Iraq. The same intelligence network that is now giving information on Iran.
If the information stated that Iran was close to beginning production of a nuclear device, you would be foaming at the mouth and howling about it being Iraq all over again and Bush is lying.
Why all of a sudden do you wish to believe this intelligence?
What if, once again, the intelligence is wrong and Iran has succeeded fooling everybody. I expect you will blame Bush.
.
2007-12-05 15:49:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is already being contradicted by other reports, and weren't these the same guys that gathered the information that everyone looked at, Rep and Dems alike, that said Iraq was still persuing nukes and had Wmd's? Why believe them now?
2007-12-05 15:37:05 · answer #4 · answered by booman17 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No.
I think that the leak of the NIE was to expose liberals as America-hating, hell-spawned morons.
Iran still sponsors terrorist groups, they're still enriching uranium, they're still expanding their centrifuge inventory, and they still have never opened their dozens of nuclear facilities to AIEA inspectors.
And yet liberals are saying they're not a threat and GWB is a liar.
This is better than the movies! Liberals will believe anything that makes Bush look bad, and they never learn the word "backlash".
2007-12-05 15:36:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Hey libs, should Bush listen to intelligence reports (as he did before Iraq) or not? It appears that at this point in time you think that the intelligence reports are the best thing since sliced bread and in the past they were crap. Has anything changed?
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
2007-12-05 15:36:50 · answer #6 · answered by Freedom Guy 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
the 05' or 07' report. they are the exact opposite regarding iran. which one should we believe?
2007-12-05 15:43:26 · answer #7 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it ?! But I'm sure there will be more excuses to justify attacking Iran ?!
Regards.
2007-12-05 23:42:30 · answer #8 · answered by iceman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you read the entire report? It proves the President correct.
2007-12-05 15:38:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No.
At this point it's obvious that either the administration CANNOT or CARES NOT to learn lessons. They are willfully and repeatedly destroying America.
2007-12-05 15:38:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋