Does the report say that Iran definately isn't seeking a nuke or just that we don't have any intellegence that proves it?
"......U.S. confirmation that it has no information about the existence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran,"
Chi - once again you fall on the anti-American side.
2007-12-05 07:15:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Something to think about for you, why do you think that that announcement came out the day after Israel stonewalled Bushes attempts to an agreement at Anapolis? Who was the most shocked and blindsided by this sudden reversal and revelation? Israel perhaps? How does that make them look ? Just some food for thought on a deeper level.
2007-12-05 07:16:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by booman17 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes, of course !? He caused many problems for Iran, apology is the least he can do!?
My Best Regards.
2007-12-05 15:03:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by iceman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No the report said they stop after the saction were imposed.
That there is still much to investigate about Iran.
I wish people would read the full report and not just the headlines.
2007-12-05 07:21:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Heck no, do u no what Iran says about us??? This is why we need a tough conservative in office so they dont worry about little harful words like this!
2007-12-05 08:06:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by j41 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. I never heard Iran apologize for taking Americans hostage for 444 days and I believe that their President quite possibly had something to do with it. We owe them nothing whatsoever.
2007-12-05 07:15:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, do you really think the president is going to take anything the intelligence community says at face value anymore after the WMDs fiasco, I know I wouldn't. The Israelis don't believe and I think the president should keep careful watch on Iran.
2007-12-05 07:14:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
When Iran offers complete, unfettered access to its nuclear program and demostrates to out 100% satisfaction that it is for peaceful purposes only, then we can consider an apology.
Until then, they had a nuclear program at one time not too long ago. Who's to say they won't want one again?
2007-12-05 07:15:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pythagoras 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Based on his past performance, I think Bush probably feels like he owes Iran an invasion.
He hasn't been one to allow intelligence to sway any decision he makes.
2007-12-05 07:17:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Neo Con-Artists NEVER feel compelled to apologize to their marks, which is also why he will never apologize to the American people.
2007-12-05 07:50:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋