2007-12-05 07:07:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So we can get back to rational discussion
2007-12-05 07:08:15 · update #1
Thats Bush Derangement Syndrome
2007-12-05 07:12:54 · update #2
Im not obsessed with Bill YOU ARE!
2007-12-05 07:13:14 · update #3
not soon, Moveon.org has not told them when.... wait to 08, when they loose the election and realize that Bush wasn't on the ballot.... Lieberman and some Democrats put it right, that is the party does not break away from the far left it will be the defeat of them.....
2007-12-05 07:12:58 · answer #1 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
I am afraid BDS, as well as CDS, RDS, BCDS, are chronic cases not acute. This generation will have to live with it for life.
edit: Gosh! I never suspected this BDS you mention was so bad. I am not a Bush supporter in the least. But, Bush finally did something right by shoring up the subprime mortgage industry. He came up with a solution that was a temporary regulation and requires no federal funding. It's win win, yet people are jumping in his dung over it like he just nuked China or something.
Geesh!
2007-12-05 07:21:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, we still see people suffering from two forms of CDS (Carter Derangement Syndrome and Clinton Derangement Syndrome), so it might be around for a while. Luckily, the people diagnosed with BDS have an advantage over those with either or both forms of CDS. They have a rational basis for having acquired the syndrome, so once the source is removed, a full recovery is expected.
2007-12-05 07:12:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
I don't know you guys are still obsessed with Bill and he hasn't been in office since 2000.
I like what the first poster said. BDS=Back to a Democratic Society movement. Right ON!!!
I never said you were impressed with Bill, I said you and your fellow cons are obsessed with Bill. You do understand the difference in word usage don't you?
2007-12-05 07:12:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'll give it a year after January 20, 2009, that is, if the democrats win, if the Republicans win, Never!!
2007-12-05 07:21:35 · answer #5 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If we go by neo-con standards in reference to Bill Clinton, I'd say at least until 2023
1992 Clinton takes office
2007 neo-cons still invoke his name in their discussions
2007 - 1992 = 15 years
2023 - 2008 = 15 years
2007-12-05 07:11:30 · answer #6 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Never
BDS or Back to Democratic Society is a growing movement in America
2007-12-05 07:10:44 · answer #7 · answered by whirling W dervish 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Well, he's been out of office for seven years and neocons are still suffering CDS...
2007-12-05 07:21:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋