Lucky wants to invite Sam to hang around Liz's children. That is not going to fly over very well. I can't wait for more fireworks.
2007-12-05 05:32:01 · 20 answers · asked by Soda 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television ➔ Soap Operas
Thomas get real.
So what if his name is on the birth certificate, that doesn't make him father of the year. They ARE still Liz's children and Lucky is wrong to bring Sam into their life.
2007-12-05 05:43:42 · update #1
A Father has the right to have his children around his girlfriend and interact with her....but... NOT when shes a psycho crazy lady!!!!
When Lucky finds out what Sam really did, hes going to be mad at Liz again for not telling him yet another incident!
Augh!
Sam has her nerve!
2007-12-05 10:02:37 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ðñê £ðvê♥ 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
my question to u is if he's dating sam what are they suppose to do? is sam suppose to run out the room everytime the children are there? is she suppose to leave every public place she enters if lucky or liz is there with the kids? give me a break! liz can object if she wants, that's her right but lucky has been the only father that those boys know. jason as much as i like him is not father material. i want the truth out in the open but i want the best person for the job to get it and that person is obviously lucky. and if liz wants lucky in those kids lives she has to accept that sam or any woman lucky may get with in the future is going to be a part of their lives.
granted the stick up in the park was wrong on sam's part but those kids were never in danger and sam would not hurt a child. i wish they would kill off liz so bad.
2007-12-05 23:54:46 · answer #2 · answered by boutux 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Lucky? Sam? Jake? Cameron?
Lucky said that Jason has to stay away because of his dangerous lifestyle, but look at Sam! She is the one that hired people to scare off Liz, and god knows what else Sam has done in her life time. Yet Jason, the greiving brother and nice man (and real father of Jake) can't see his own child? Lucky is sooooooo ridiculous. Lucky knows that Liz hates her too!
2007-12-09 01:44:02 · answer #3 · answered by Nat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lucky is not the father of either of Cameron or Jake. Yes Lucky is listed on Jake's brth certificate, but he's not the father. As for Cameron, Lucky didn't even adopt him. Both Cameron and Jake ARE Elizabeth's kids. Jason IS Jake's biological father even though Lucky told him to stay away from him because Lucky thinks he is the safer choice.
Zander is Cam's father, but he is dead and Lucky is the only father he knows. I hope Jason and Elizabeth make a home for Cam and Jake soon. Bottom line is Lucky has no clout over Liz. Not after all the crap he's pulled with the pills, Maxie, and Sam.
2007-12-06 14:33:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I love how people want to bash Lucky and Sam. If Liz would let Jason raise HIS son and quit being a whiny brat than Lucky and Sam wouldn't be involved anymore. You had to have know that Sam was originally using Lucky for more than one reason. She wanted to be involved in Jason's childs life. That is why she wanted Jason to claim his son and when he didn't she moved on to Lucky, since he is acting as the father. I love Sam but like this wasn't predictable? And I am sorry to say they aren't only Liz's kids.
2007-12-06 05:05:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
As a Mother, you never want to think of anyone else around your children playing Mom but yourself. So I think no matter who Lucky would decide to date, Liz would have a problem. It is a much bitter pill to swallow because it's Sam, Sam hates her and she hates Sam. But the fact is Lucky has chosen to see Sam and Liz has chosen to not be Lucky's wife any longer, that means they are both going to be mad about a lot of things. I think I will leave my judgement about Sam and the kids until I see the interaction between them. If she treats them good then that's all any Mom can ask. Liz don't have to like her.
2007-12-05 09:08:26 · answer #6 · answered by Gee-Gee 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
A parent does not make a parent. Even if the child is not their biological child. A parent is when - they are there for you know matter what. So - if lucky wants Sam to be a apart of the kids life. That's OK. I know what Sam did was uncalled for. But Elizabeth did things that were uncalled for too. Two wrongs do not make a right. Lucky loves those kids even if they where not his biological children. A parent does not have to be a biological parent. A parent can be anyone that loves you and want the best for you. And that person will protect you at any cost. So - you see even though lucky is not the boys biological father - he still loves them the same as if they where. He will always be there for them and he will always put them first before himself.
2007-12-05 06:49:47 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Lucky is thinking like a father. And let's stop calling them Liz's children, she is not the Virgin Mary and they were not immaculately conceived despite what the character of Liz may think. Lucky is Jake's father (His name is on the birth certificate in New York State (and Port Charles is in nYS) that makes him the legal father and no DNA test can overrule that) and has every right to expect that his son interact with his new girlfriend. As to Cameron he is the only father the boy has ever known and it is a matter of nurture over nature there and so he is Cameron Father. Again he has every right to expect him to interact with his new girl friend
My friend the birth certificate is REAL. Father hood is a hell of lot more the DNA. I have four sons, three not my own, by DNA would you tell me the other three are not mine? My sister was adopted when she was 17, does that mean she is not my sister? Come on
As to father of the year I never said he was father of the year. But as a good honest cop he is a far better father then an EMO hit man. Lucky has every right to introduce the children to his new girlfriend.
Yes Sam has put the children in danger but then again Sonny and Jason put their whole families in danger all the time and every one jumps to defend them. Why is Sam so unforgivable and everything is forgiven Sonny and Jason. I would suspect that she actually looks better with her shirt off then they do. So why the double standard?
So what they are Liz's. They are also his
Why is it that people seem to think that they are Liz's and Liz's alone. No woman gets to have a child without the help of a man and so therefore the men who are the children's father's get to have the same rights as the mother.
2007-12-05 05:39:10 · answer #8 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Liz needs to get over herself. She lets Jason a "dangerous" person around the kids, so the only objection she will have is bc it's Sam. Sam is 10 times the woman Liz will ever be and she knows it. Sam made mistakes, but at least she's not a fake *** *****. I agree... Liz should have died instead of Emily!!!
2007-12-06 04:43:52 · answer #9 · answered by jasam4ever08 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Lucky is in the dark when it comes to Sam. Soon Liz will be forced to tell him the truth. Then we will see some fireworks.
2007-12-05 06:35:17 · answer #10 · answered by Jen N 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I want Liz to tell Lucky about Sam seeing the crazy lady kidnap Jake and how Sam hired the men to scare Liz and the boys in the park. Sam is rotten. Lucky needs to see Sam for what she really is.
**EDIT**
Wow, there are really some Sam lovers out there. I, however, am not one of them.
2007-12-06 02:06:34 · answer #11 · answered by Pink 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋