Pick An Answer Only.
No paragraph.
2007-12-05 05:23:29 · 16 answers · asked by Shary 6 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
May be one or two short sentences for voting purposes.
2007-12-05 05:29:42 · update #1
According to the evolution, the dog, the fox and the wolf have one common ancestory.
2007-12-05 05:31:43 · update #2
I actually love applying darwin's theory to evolutionary psychology. Survival of the fittest, in terms of parts of our pysche.... Kind of used to describe why good intelligent people dude stupid crap sometimes. I love Darwin's overall idea of evolution... Doesn't explain everything, and I definetly DO believe that Darwin's theories don't automatically disprove any kind of religion or the 'theory of intelligent design'.... God very easily could have made us evolve like such.... Darwin and God CAN BE FRIENDS!
2007-12-05 05:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by draconislei 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Very much. As close to 100% as one can get about any sort of scientific theory. People always get all touchy about this subject because they think you can believe in Darwin or God, but not both. This is not true. They are not mutually exclusive. I believe in both, and I don't see why a person couldn't.
2007-12-05 13:27:49 · answer #2 · answered by K 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I completely accept the very high probability that the theory regarding evolution by natural selection, which is based upon work by Charles Darwin and many others, is correct.
2007-12-05 13:41:22 · answer #3 · answered by Lucas C 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Very Much believe. Evolution is not based just on the fossil record. It can be observed in species today and we are learning more about how the genetics work every day.
2007-12-05 13:35:19 · answer #4 · answered by Gary H 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Very much.
As much as I accept the theory of gravity, the cell theory of life, the heliocentric theory of the solar system, the atomic theory of matter ... etc. etc.
And in science we say "accept" not "believe." It is *never* a matter of believing things unconditionally ... it's always just understanding and acceptance *based on the current evidence.*
2007-12-05 13:36:21 · answer #5 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Totally Not Believe
He tried to prove his theory with a pigs tooth!! If things evolved at the rate they think then we would either not have any monkeys as they would all be human or we would have monkeys half-monkey- humans still evolving and humans. It just makes no sense to think that one day they were evolving and then next *poof* there not.
http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/nebraska.html ( The Pigs Tooth theory)
2007-12-05 13:36:50 · answer #6 · answered by Blessed Rain 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Totally not believe. Darwin was not a scientist and nothing in his theory can be proven using the fossil record.
2007-12-05 13:26:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
much
i dont think darwin was 100% correct but the tons fo evidence support the evolution theory that is at the heart of it
2007-12-05 13:27:44 · answer #8 · answered by froggy_logic 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Very Much
2007-12-05 13:25:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Believe-very much.
2007-12-05 13:26:44 · answer #10 · answered by Fred F 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋