Why are all the defenders of Iran focused solely on Nukes? They've been distributing weapons in Iraq that get

Question

Americans killed by the dozen. That's indisputable and proved. They've been the supplier of arms for terrorists and everyone wants to focus solely on a nuke program? Great distraction.

Ok GOPcorrup..
It was easily proved. When we recovered the pieces of shrapnel we were able to forensically and balistically match the weapons. They came from Iran. Proof Positive. We convict people on that evidence in the US every single day.
Now, when you are a Marine and you've pulled the corpse of your burnt brother out of a hummer that got ran over an IED what do you want to do? You want nothing more than to attack the source. When you move the bodies of kids off the sidewalk from an IED or RPG planted in a town what do you want to do? You want the source of the weapons. In any war or conflict YOU ALWAYS cut off the supply. No supplies means no ability to fight. But lets go ahead and focus on Nukes right because that's real relevant to my friend that died yesterday or two weeks ago and it could just as easily have been me.

Its amazing that some of you people are so polarized that you sanction the random and wanton murder of innocent people. None of your arguments so far justify one reason why I can't go cut off the supply line of weapons. How ridiculous.

Answer 1

Exactly. I guess the way the left works is if it's against our country, they support it. Why try to make sense of bottom feeders like that.

I love the sick replies you're getting saying who cares if our American soldiers are getting killed -- in the past, the USA did this and the USA did that.... That's the Ron Paul mentality, blame the USA. Disgusting.

Answer 2

Good question, but it is the President who said Iran was trying to develop nuclear weapons in attempts to get the American people behind him when he decides to invade Iran. So rightly so, the NIE report puts the "World War III" threat and fearmongering to rest. Now, as far as supplying weapons to "terrorists", it has NOT been proven that the Iranian gov't, under the leadership of Ahmadinejad or the other clerics, has authorized the killing of American troops. But that is debatable...you just can't make up facts about nuclear weapons programs within a 5 year span and think you can get away with it again!!! I'll give Bush credit though, it takes some Texas-sized balls to lie to the American people again...the administration knew the Iran had no program months ago and yet he still cranked up the rhetoric.

Answer 3

Oh come on! For 2 years all we've heard from the right regarding Iran is we have to stop them from getting nukes. Now that the threat appears to be less than the Bush administration has been telling us, the right is shifting gears and down playing the nuclear aspect. Using your logic then we should actually be declaring war on Saudi Arabia since most of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are from that country, not Iran.
It's not a question of "defending Iran". That's nonsense. It's about not getting caught up in the spin coming out of the white house and looking at the facts as they really are.

Answer 4

Sure Iran is supplying certain groups in Iraq with weapons, why wouldn't they. The US has done the same, and in far great quantities, in countries all around the world for decades (i.e. the US armed Iraq when Iran and Iraq were at war). What is the difference between what the US has done and what Iran is doing? And yet we condemn Iran alone for their actions? The sword cuts both ways. As far as the nuclear program in Iran, it is as they have stated for years, only concerned with nuclear power, not weapons. Should we monitor that? Absolutely but until given reasons to doubt, Iran has every right to pursue nuclear energy,

Answer 5

And Iraqis killed by the hundreds of thousands..... Some have never figured out that the bloody WMDS that Saddam Hussein had in Iraq (once upon a time) were gotten mostly from the USA! Now thanks to Bush and his mindless foreign policy, a mostly secular government in the Middle East---and outside of Israel and Turkey, there exists no such in the Middle East--- that is the secular Bath party of Hussein has been overthrown, and now a Pro-Iranian Shiite controlled Iraq is emerging which makes for a rather volatile combo, don't you think? Thanks Bush, you boil on the butt of humanity, I feel much SAFER now. I'll feel even safer when Bush stops playing the grotesque hypocrite that he is and gets rid of HIS WMDs! Iran wants to develop nuclear power and possibly nuclear weapons, quite true.

The USA has enough to blast the entire species into extinction! I'm more scared of the USA than Iran, more scared of Bush and people like him than the looniest of Ayatollahs. The Republicans scare me more than Hamas!

Answer 6

Where's your 'indisputable' source?

And what of all the weapons and money the US has 'lost' in Iraq? None of those guns could have possibly been used to attack our troops or the money used to finance ops against the same?

Answer 7

I wouldn't call them defenders of Iran; however, the administration has had the largest focus on "nucular" weapons. If they make their program transparent, we should in turn open ties. I know that they did horrible things in the past, but remember if you are a Christian - that thing about forgiveness.

Answer 8

Saudi Arabia is by far the biggest supplier of money and weapons to insurgents and fundamentalist Muslims. Why don't we ever hear of attacking them?

Answer 9

they probably saw it as a chance to get america back we put saddam in power then gave him guns missles and wmds to fight the iraninas but he gas the kurds with them instead.but over 50% of the attacks in iraq on american troops are not iraqi or iranian but saudi.

or could be they think we're a threat to their safety,we know we're not a threat to their safety but they might think that since we occupy their neighbor to the east afghanistan and their neighbor to the west iraq

Answer 10

At least some one is paying attention. The libs are quick to side with Iran after recent intelligence reports, all the while ignoring the big picture.