After all, didn't they undermine Our President's policy in a Time of War?
Isn't Iran the central member of the Axis of Evil?
Isn't Iran a State Sponsor of Terror?
Isn't their president Another Hitler?
Shouldn't we be more worried about planning for war with Iran, and less worried about the facts?
2007-12-05 03:58:00 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Give them time, it will happen, I have no doubt.
2007-12-05 04:01:13 · answer #1 · answered by slykitty62 7 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Isn't anyone who disagrees with The Supreme PooBah GWB a traitor? I thought he outlawed opinions that differed from his? He wants a war with Iran and will pitch a fit until it happens. The little men in the rubber trucks with the white jackets need to take him off before it happens.
2007-12-05 12:07:46 · answer #2 · answered by momatad 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No, The report is from a whole collection of agencies. If it was an individual, they'd call him (or her) a traitor. With this, they'll claim (as they've already begun to) that the NIE report justifies Bush's belligerent foreign policy.
2007-12-05 12:10:04 · answer #3 · answered by Fretless 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. And no conservative has even remotely intimated anything like that.
We believe in facts, and if the facts say they have suspended their weapons development, then that's what the facts are. By the way, have UN or other authorized inspectors gone in and verified this? I didn't see anybody saying that. Did I miss something?
The report also said that Iran was a major threat because of their support for jihadists, both arming them and funding them. So it doesn't really change anything.
As for facts, I see you only cherry-pick the ones that support your position, and ignore the rest. How... dishonest.
2007-12-05 12:13:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Iran is a State Sponsor of Terror, which makes them evil.
Nothing has changed. Do you understand the report?
2007-12-05 12:05:51 · answer #5 · answered by pgb 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I think some may think that. I don't think that Ahmadinejad is the person of the century, but I think the NIE board is made of critical thinkers - which is much more dependable that a gut feeling.
2007-12-05 12:02:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
I did not sayh any of this. I am stating that the report can be wrong. Intelligence gather is not 100% accurate.
2007-12-05 12:05:30 · answer #7 · answered by David_the_Great 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Give Rush Limbaugh and Fox News time to formulate their neo-con talking points.
2007-12-05 12:03:31 · answer #8 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
They are already attacking the intelligence professionals who wrote the report.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/12/the_key_question_about_the_nie.html
2007-12-05 12:02:39 · answer #9 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Of course they must be. Letting the cat out of the bag.
Damn libs.
Freaky question.
2007-12-05 12:06:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Knee jerk Neocons are dying to start a war with Iran. Besides, their Zionist masters in Israel demand it.
2007-12-05 12:01:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋