Why John Bolton Was Right To Ask If MushMouth, Millhouse And Dogsbody, On their respective Networks?

Question

Will the rooftop criers find their way down from the perch of Inquisitorial Judgment and report this?
http://newsmax.com/timmerman/iran_nukes/2007/12/04/54359.html

andy: your computation shows a defined lack of factual structure.

Sixteen intelligence agencies signed off on this recent NIE?
That's the conclusion?

Answer 1

that is absolutely true..what cracks me up is the submissions of non-knowers that GWB was sitting on this info in 2003..

when as I posted last night the NIE is ex-State Dept bureaucrats..guess who else worked for the State Dept??

Ambassador Joe Wilson ( his Gore-contributor wife)..the Queen of Lorton Va..Valerie Plame was CIA

Answer 2

Learn English, your question makes no sense.

As far as the NIE, it is the consensus opinion signed off upon by 16 intelligence bodies. Carping over who wrote the draft does nothing to address the central points - the facts contained therein, which no one is disputing.

Iran has not done anything. This information is similar to information that was raised about Iraq, but was ignored, dismissed and hidden by the current administration. The head of the IAEC, who we ridiculed as a buffoon when he stated there was no hard evidence of WMD programs in Iraq has also stated Iran in not close, so there's time for diplomacy.

All the people who were right before are saying the same things about Iran.

All the people who were completely wrong about everything say we should ignore people who were proven completely right, and we should listen to them, not based on evidence, but because they wish it were so.

What kind of moron sides with the people with the track record of stupidity and failure? Oh, I guess you do.