English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The NIE was released to the White House 8 months ago and there were only a few minor changes made to it since then.

So if you believe that Bush had no clue that Iran stopped it's nuke weapon production, doesn't that make him an inept leader?

Or was he purposely being obtuse in not bothering to find out the truth?

2007-12-05 03:28:45 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

driveranderson: How does Iran's medium range missiles affect the US? They won't reach us.

Also, the first NIE which discussed Saddam's capabilities was highly politicized by the White House and purposely amended to reflect the message that the Administration wanted to get out to the media. The most revealing thing about the recent NIE is that the Administration's dirty fingers were not all over it (for once).

2007-12-05 03:41:06 · update #1

7 answers

He is told by his gopher staff what to do, what to say, and is only told "ON A NEED TO KNOW BASIS" and I think he knew.......Personally I think this administration just stinks"

2007-12-05 03:34:44 · answer #1 · answered by Toffy 6 · 0 1

Iran has medium range missles
The 2003 NIE was wrong but you give this one credibility
Iran is enriching Uranium
A.Q. Khan th father of Pakistan's Nuke program Helped the Iranians with their program.
Iran won't let the UN operate in their country.
Iraq would not cooperate with the inspectors in their country unde saddam
So you blame Bush for a bad Report in 2003 and hail a report produced by the same idiots in 2007 Do the math where that puts you.

2007-12-05 03:37:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

right this is the certainty. Iran has an economic gadget the size of Finland's and an annual protection funds of around $4.8 billion. It has no longer invaded a rustic because of the fact the late 18th century. the USA has a GDP this is sixty 8 situations greater and protection costs that are a hundred and ten situations greater effective. Israel and each Arab u . s . (different than syria & Iraq) are quietly or actively allied against Iran. And yet we are to have faith that Tehran is approximately to overturn the international gadget and replace it with an Islamo-fascist order? What planet are we on? while the rather average Mohammed Khatami replace into elected president in Iran, American conservatives pronounced that he replace into purely a figurehead. authentic ability, they pronounced (properly), exceedingly administration of the army and police, replace into wielded by using the unelected "splendid chief," Ayatolla Ali Khamenei. Now that Ahmadinejad is president, they declare his finger is on the button. (Oh wait Iran would not have a nuclear button yet and could no longer for a minimum of three to eight years, in accordance to the CIA, by using which factor Ahmadinejad won't be president anymore. yet those are purely info.) In a speech, Rudy Giuliani pronounced that whilst the Soviet Union and China could desire to be deterred in the time of the chilly conflict, Iran won't be able to be. the Soviet and chinese language regimes had a "residual rationality," he defined. Hmm. Stalin and Mao--who casually ordered the deaths of tens of millions of their very own people, formented insurgencies and revolutions, and starved finished areas that antagonistic them--have been rational people. yet no Ahmadinejad, who has executed what that compares? between the weird and wonderful twists of the present Iran hysteria is that conservatives have become exceptionally charitable approximately 2 of historic past's properly suited mass murderers. final twelve months, the Princeton pupil, Bernard Lewis, an intensive adviser to Bush and VPresident Cheny, wrote an op-ed in the Wall street magazine predicting that on Aug. 22, 2006, President Ahmadinejad replace into going to end the international. The date, he defined, "is the evening while many Muslims commemorate the evening flight of the Prophet Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to "the farthest mosque", oftentimes pointed out with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back. this could perhaps be deemed an suitable date for the apocalytic ending of Israel and if mandatory of the international" (my emphasis). this might all be humorous if it weren't so risky.

2016-10-19 06:28:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's not hard to believe Bush having no clue about how to tie his shoes...

2007-12-05 03:33:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Everything in this world is like Hollywood, never happen only an illusion made by our minds, like live itself.

2007-12-05 03:31:22 · answer #5 · answered by kollo 1 · 0 2

He has never had a clue about anything.

2007-12-05 03:37:03 · answer #6 · answered by Wounded Duck 7 · 0 0

He a moron but a war monger also.

2007-12-05 10:02:31 · answer #7 · answered by Roy 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers