I don't like Clinton at all, he was a horrible president... that aside, what he did with Monica was a no brainer...
Set a picture of them both side by side... At least it wasn't Janet Reno... All Clinton would have to have done, was to say fellas... what would you have done.. instead of I didn't have sexual relations with that woman blah blah blah... Then to try and skew the meaning of sex...
That act alone was the most productive thing he did in that office in the 8 years he was president...
2007-12-05 02:56:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by damond h 6
·
3⤊
6⤋
So you are saying the the POTUS must concentrate only on some Arab who happens to be taking flying lessons and nothing else? I don't approve of what he did with the bimbos but there were many things he had to be concerned with. I wonder what Atta did during the period between January and September when Bush was in office? Planning? Organizing? Training? The Clinton people warned the Bush people about Al Qaeda but they were ignored.
2007-12-05 02:55:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
In speaking of priorities, I wonder where Bush & Co.'s priorities were shortly after the 9/11 attacks. It has been said that within 5 HOURS after the attacks, Rumsfeld ordered his staff to dig up as much "evidence" as possible linking Iraq to the attacks. Not only that, but it was only 6 MONTHS after the attacks that Bush said that capturing bin Laden was "not our priority".
2007-12-05 03:00:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by tangerine 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, it appears that many of the blamers of 9/11 still insist on pointing fingers at a president who was OUT OF OFFICE at the time, rather than admit that this murderous tragedy was caused by:
1.) Pigs -- mostly from Saudi Arabia, who wanted to murder as many people as they could;
2.) Osama Binladen, whom we HAVE NOT KILLED, despite a vow to do so
To trivialize 9/11 by trotting out Clinton's private affair is to disrespect the memory of those who were murdered.
----------
Add: Tangerine, here's a link to substantiate your allegation that Rumsfeld used 9/11 to support an attack in Iraq:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml
2007-12-05 03:02:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
As hard as Dick and Bush.
But at least Clinton understood the threat.
1. Bill Clinton increased the FBI's counterterrorism budget by almost 400 percent after World Trade Center bombing, from $78.5 million in 1993 to $301.2 million in 1999.
2. Additionally the number of FBI agents devoted full-time to counterterrorism increased, from 550 in 1993 to 1,383 in 1999.
3. After OKC, Clinton pressed congress to pass a strong anti-terrorism bill, but instead the cons said he was overreacting (including Cheney who said Clinton was "obsessed with terrorism") and ended up with a watered down version.
2007-12-05 02:57:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by kenny J 6
·
8⤊
0⤋
Obviously, you're not a Clinton fan. If you have a gripe, man up and speak your piece instead of posting stupid questions that have no basis in fact.
2016-05-28 07:08:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow... Bill got a BJ about ten years ago and you're still talking about it... I guess that says something about what a rare and noteworthy thing oral sex is in your life.
2007-12-05 02:54:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fretless 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
will guliani work hard in the oval office spending tax payer money to pay for his tranny mistress sex change while he divorce another wife in the process
2007-12-05 02:55:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
probably not, and neither is bush and condi, even after the instructors notified the BUSH administration.
2007-12-05 03:08:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by smarternow 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, they were "boneing up" on ways to prevent a "stain " on society, after the "insertion" of the planes in the (her) "twin towers". Afterwards, they enjoyed a cigar together.
2007-12-05 02:53:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by booman17 7
·
1⤊
6⤋