And places this form of power in the hands of persons who want to attain this level of "authority" over others, what timely protections and recourse will a person/individual have to keep themself from being forced to change their beliefs to fit the "communities expectations".
This proposed law; is unnecessary, all recourse and lawful acts are established via the Constitution and so are individual protections.
Dead men warned you about this level of judgement, and the persons and conditions that would attempt to attain this level of power over citizens.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-1955
2007-12-05 01:56:50 · 2 answers · asked by dollysj 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/
2007-12-05 02:13:07 · update #1
It is scary to me, they will be able to label us terrorists if we stand up to them.
They also are studying whether they should censor the internet from radical ideas....
this pisses me off the most....
I would be a radical, just because i believe in freedoms and limited govt intervention in our lives
wanting power decentralized and brought locally is radical
Conformists do not understand this at all...
2007-12-05 02:03:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jane Harman and the 404 Reps who voted for it should be shipped off to Old Red Russia.
That's not what I wanted to say, but the Senate is voting on this $#%T any minute now and... well, you know.
The good news is, even the fascist SCOTUS would strike this un-American garbage down in a heartbeat. And they will.
2007-12-05 02:07:08 · answer #2 · answered by doug4jets 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋