Will hard line US foreign policy simply be echoed with hard line foreign policy in return?
Most Americans hate Iran. Most Iranians hate America. A war hawk leads the USA. A war hawk leads Iran.
Does this seem like a recipe for peace?
What do you think it will take to defuse the American/Iranian situation and build an environment of trust between these two peoples?
Or, will only war settle this problem?
2007-12-05 01:42:38 · 18 answers · asked by Overt Operative 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i think it will take a different president and a different
approach. war should be last resort, thats why we have
united nations.
we should try the united nations approach and watch iran
carefully.
hopefully if they get a new president as well as us that
might help. you asked a good question.
2007-12-05 01:49:10 · answer #1 · answered by Jerry S 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I don't think most Americans hate Iran, nor do I think most Iranians hate America. This is a myth that some people would like others to believe, that these two groups can't get along and have to fight it out. Don't buy the hype. The recent NIE report seems to be a good stepping stone towards calming down the sabre rattling.
2007-12-05 01:59:02 · answer #2 · answered by Pfo 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I disagree with your contention that most Americans hate Iranians. I know many Iranians and Ahmadinejad is highly unpopular now with the Iranian public. I also believe that most Iranians don't hate Americans.
It's the right wing extremists in both countries who are driving the push to war. Wouldn't life be so much better without right wing extremists?
2007-12-05 01:48:03 · answer #3 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
The easiest way to get people to agree is to find a common enemy.
As long as there is very little tolerance for diversity, trust may never happen.
Also, all the citizens must take interest and responsibility. Letting things happen because you think you can't fight the "authority", is the biggest excuse for the crimes against humanity.
2007-12-05 01:57:18 · answer #4 · answered by Hacksaw 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
"most Americans hate Iran"
Really? I don't hate Iran. Why would I hate Iran?
And I've seen documentaries on Democracy Now which shows that the average Iranian CITIZEN has no problem with AMERICANS whatsoever. They aren't too crazy about bush, though. And neither am I.
War isn't even an option.
WAR IS OBSOLETE.
2007-12-05 01:49:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
there is always a way out of war. but there is always a way into as well. bush will be gone and there will be a new prez in soon. the iran people dont hate us. that is just what we hear on tv. for the most part they wont to have what we have but there gov wont let them. its also some of there religens falt. to watch some of the things we do on tv is aginest there relig. but i dont think there is going to be a war. there is just to much to loose on both sides and they know that. its just big talk by both.
2007-12-05 01:49:15 · answer #6 · answered by the wild child rock star 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I am a firm believer in in reaping what you sow. For those who ignore the the poor calling them lazy bums when many of them are mentally ill or vets .I feel sorry for you too, because it will come back to haunt you. As far as George Bush goes ,he has a lot of blood on his hands. He seems to disregard diplomacy.
2007-12-05 01:55:49 · answer #7 · answered by RELAX 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It will not come to war. Amadinajad doesn't have the stones to declare open war on the USA. He will continue his Islamic madman rhetoric in the hopes of gathering more radical madmen to his cause. He will continue to sponsor sneak attack terrorism. That is what psychopaths do.
2007-12-05 01:57:50 · answer #8 · answered by Mother 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
particular. Karma would not choose you based on your ideals in any respect yet as a replace on the way you behaved ethically. i do no longer think of it ends up in people to asserting "they deserve it and for this reason do no longer help them" if understood proper because of the fact the 2nd you think of, say or act like this is the case than you create purely as lots undesirable karma because of the fact the guy who's oppressing somebody like in relation to baby prostitution as an occasion. in case you're saying the baby merits it then you definately are purely as in charge because of the fact the guy who's oppressing the baby and could meet with the staggering comparable effects. Karma is composed of no longer purely your intentional strikes yet additionally your intentional inactions. no count number if the outcomes are because of the fact the guy replace right into a undesirable individual in a prior existence or no longer that could desire to no longer save people from helping others. purely concentration on coming up a greater desirable existence for each individual shifting forward. observe: no longer each thing is the consequence of previous karma. Buddhism recognizes already that existence isn't honest. i've got no longer regarded heavily at different theories of karma yet in the Buddhist theory of karma, karma is barely one in each of 5 regulations for this reason you do no longer ought to assert that the individuals deserved the tsunami when you consider that karma would not administration the waves and the tides as an occasion: Karma Niyama — effects of one's strikes Utu Niyama — Seasonal changes and climate Biija Niyama — regulations of heredity Citta Niyama — Will of techniques Dhamma Niyama — Nature's tendency to offer a suitable form
2016-10-19 06:14:31 · answer #9 · answered by bobbee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We need to start following our traditional foreign policy of Non- Interventionism.
Ron Paul Revolution.
Theres Hope For America.
2007-12-05 01:45:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋