does the official report of 9/11 go against physical laws of being?

Question

i do not agree that 9/11 was an inside job. Only because, George W. Bush was not included in the conspiracy. do you agree?

umm, i was saying he was a puppet.

there is not an inside job!

Answer 1

The consistant fabrications by those claiming 9/11 to be an inside job lacks one very important requirement - FACTS.

Setting aside the exhaustive research peformed by Popular Mechanics, several universities, and a host of credible organizations in good standing with the sane, rational thinking community, there has yet to be a single, provable, credible piece of evidence that 9/11 was anything other than what has been reported by the government and accepted by the mass media.

With all other evidence aside, the most notable lack of evidence I can find is that there has never been anybody to claim that they were involved in a conspiracy to partake in 9/11. There would have had to have been thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people involved, yet not one person has leaked there involvement.

Answer 2

You seem to be asking 3 questions. What do I think of the official report of 9/11? The laws of being???? What are you talking about on that one? And, do I agree or disagree with the inside job theory?

1) I've only read or heard just a few bits of the report. I can't really answer that.

2) Physical laws of being? Are you trying to ask what happened to the bodies? That I know. Everything that was in the way as the tops of the buildings came down was absolutely pulverized and vaporized. It was the same effect as what happens to the things engulfed by a pyroclastic flow from a huge volcano. Every thing is disintegrated.

3) No, I don't think it was an inside job. I mean, honestly, did anyone (other than Osama) EVER envision such a nightmare? Small planes accidentally hitting the towers,sure. But fuel loaded jets flown by people who had been here for years and still were willing to commit suicide and murder all that time?

I really don't think anyone expected such a scenario. Besides, Bush wouldn't have understood it anyway. Ahhh...nope. That, ah,would never happen.

Right.

Addendum: OH! You're a Nihilist! So are you in disbelief that 9/11 ever happened? Or are you just rejecting the beliefs of others, and the facts, for the sake of doing so? Sometimes the truth of a situation can be right in front of your eyes, but you will not see it because YOU are feeling worthless and you feel YOUR life is pointless.

Your life is what you make of it. If you don't want it, it won't be there.

ANOTHER ADDENDUM: I see several of you get your information from "Popular Science." I prefer more scientific journals and articles. They seem to carry more weight.

Just a thought.

Answer 3

I don't know, don't really care about the science behind it. When a building falls for no reason, then something is fishy. Like the building near the two towers.

Point blank, it was allowed to happen. Whose to say the hijackers weren't puppets and Osama was made to be an evil villian?

So who is the super hero?

People say it would be extremely hard to pull off, but in reality it wouldn't be, if it were allowed by orders given from top officials. Finding any documents or records to prove this is probably an impossible, due to the fact that the INS was disolved.

You want to find out what happened? Then research the INS and what happened to the INS immediately after 9/11. This fact alone leads me to believe that a ton of these 9/11 conspiracy theories are nothing more than illusions, because none of the conspiracy theories include this information. They serve no other purpose than to spread disinformation to conceal something. Some might contain partial truths, but only to throw off.

The INS is a major clue.

Edit:

Thank you for the retarded email about them falling because of fire. I already said I didn't care about the science behind why they fell, which I also stated that one of the buildings near the two towers fell. The one building that fell has no explaination because it wasn't hit by debri or anything, since the planes only hit the two towers and the two towers fell into a neat convenient little pile.

Like I said, look into what happened with the INS and its history. You will definitely understand as to why allowing 9/11 to happen is vastly more simple than people think. It happened because of negligence, question is was it blatant negligence to the point of aiding and abetting?

Most if not all proof was probably lost in the transition from the INS to the USCIS.

Answer 4

The people who believe that 9-11 was a conspiracy are the same people who listened to those "expert doctors" who were selling those fake diet pills on TV a few years ago.

Most of them read too many tabloids.

Answer 5

How could anyone honestly believe that our government would murder 3,000 of their own citizens? What would the motive be? How does the government benefit out of that?

And no, Popular Mechanics proved that the fire from the plane crash was hot enough to weaken the steel to the point that it gave out.

Answer 6

No, the report does not go against physical laws. Only the crack pots believe that garbage.

Answer 7

Thats if you assume that the President pulls the strings and isnt a puppet himself.

Answer 8

They probably kept G dubbya out of it because they knew his stupidity would screw up the whole plan.