Twice the density of Intel® 65nm technology.
Intel's 45nm packs about double the number of transistors into the same silicon space
More than 400 million transistors for dual-core processors.
More than 800 million transistors for quad-core.
50-percent larger L2 cache, and new levels of breakthrough energy efficiency.
Biggest advancements in fundamental transistor design in 40 years
Intel 45nm Hi-k silicon technology can deliver more than a 20 percent improvement in transistor switching speed, and reduce transistor gate leakage by over 10 fold.
O, I'm sorry did you want to say somthin AMD...?
Not to mention I got a Dell.
What do you know so far about this new chip...?
What do you think about the new revolutionary technology...?
Where are we going...?
http://www.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/45nm-core2/index.htm?cid=cim:ggl|corp_us_penryn|k88D5|s
2007-12-03 18:27:24 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Other - Hardware
yes I did and I expect it to be better than AMD's upcomming 45nm fab.
in fact now intel has roll out their Penryn chips with 45nm, and they have 3 fab lab to fabricate them. AMD will be in trouble, they need to retool their existing lab to 45nm fab, and while they say by 2008, i think only by 2009 they can produce 45nm by the masses.
next year, intel will have new architecture. the quad core will share same L2 cache, and for the first time ever (yes, because 45nm allows more components to be intergrated into the CPU die), intel will intergrate the memory controller into the CPU. Intergrated memory controller + large cache size = killer CPU
Where are we going? multicore techonolgy, superscalar, ultrascalar general purpose CPU
graphic card GPU are now already ultrascalar processors, and their working units are becoming more and more closer to general purpose SMP. That means, one day we can create a super ultrascalar processor, (maybe thousands of SMP), and this processor will do both general processing and graphic processing as well...
It's simple.
CPU = general purpose, but slowly gaining parallelism (multiple parallel cores)
GPU = High parallelism, but slowly evolving towards general purpose working units (SMP)
They both are evolving towards the same direction.
2007-12-03 20:12:29 · answer #1 · answered by Hornet One 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
incredibly, i relatively do no longer think of technologies has made track greater impersonal. there'll continuously be a elect team of individuals who will continuously decide to purchase the certainly CD and, sometimes, people who nevertheless decide to purchase the certainly vinyl (specially creditors for that those days). i comprehend that i might lots incredibly by using a CD than an MP3. in certainty, the sixty 9 albums on my iPod are albums I truthfully have on CD. I truthfully have over 2 hundred, yet i'm no longer able to place all of them on my iPod on condition that i'm no longer able to apply iTunes on my residing house computing device. sometime, i'm going to have all of them on my iPod! of direction, I nevertheless like the packaging of a CD. I propose, i like having all the lining notes and the entire packaging. Plus, if some thing got here approximately to my iTunes library, i ought to continuously replace them without paying to get each little thing lower back.
2016-10-19 02:35:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like all new technology.. cool, usefull. wow.
but really computers have been doubling in speed every two years since they came to life, if revolutionary new technology just means the same stuff crammed in to a faster processor, then it is maybe slightly better than par for the course.
Now, show me true process distribution amongst cores on a hardware level...
2007-12-03 18:59:38 · answer #3 · answered by Liz 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hahaha i hear that like 6 month ago!
here are the price list lol
http://www.hkepc.com/?id=171
2007-12-03 18:59:03 · answer #4 · answered by Insane PC Dude 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. I have. And?
2007-12-03 18:49:13 · answer #5 · answered by graceful.tantrum 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋