I am against calling them one cause I'm a bills fan but if they go undefeated throughout including the superbowl I would have to agree with patriots fans and conclude they are one. So would you agree or disagree? Why?
2007-12-03 17:03:51 · 16 answers · asked by lifeizagamble1984 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
we all know what the patriots fanz are gonna say im trying too reach the people who hate the patriots or who dont think they are a dynasty.
2007-12-03 17:32:59 · update #1
we all know what the patriots fanz are gonna say im trying too reach the people who hate the patriots or who dont think they are a dynasty.
2007-12-03 18:27:28 · update #2
No, because a team already done it before
2007-12-03 17:05:31 · answer #1 · answered by mozark281 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Forget the part about the Pats going undefeated or not. Either way, they are ALREADY a dynasty. If they go 16-0 it will only add to the list of records that Brady, Moss, and the entire team is going to set this year.
2007-12-03 17:42:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pats need one more Superbowl to make it a dynasty. They don't need to go undefeated, but they do need to win the championship. 3 in 4 years is not a dynasty, although Pats and Cowboys fans would like to think so.
2007-12-04 01:34:31 · answer #3 · answered by Eric C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With the success they have had in recent memory, the domination that they have showed, and the three, (count 'em) THREE superbowl rings in the past few years; this team already has a place in the history books. With or without an undefeated season, they are already a dynasty.
2007-12-03 17:13:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know what your definition of a dynasty is, but I think the Pats already are the closest thing to a dynasty in the 21st century. The perfect season, if they make it, will just be another jewel in the crown
2007-12-03 17:17:21 · answer #5 · answered by rob 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They've already won 3 Super Bowls this decade, yet I don't think their fan base is half as large as the Steelers, 49ers, Cowboys, etc. If they can win the Super Bowl, they are a step closer, but still not there. If they lose the Super Bowl, then the season is nearly forgettable for the Pats, and whoever beats them are the real heroes.
By the way, I'm picking the Dolphins to win on Dec 23.
2007-12-03 17:14:12 · answer #6 · answered by rath 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
an undefeted season would constitute a dynasty if you played one of the most difficult scheduals in the NFL rather than the easiest as the pats have been doing the last few seasons. If they were to step up and instead of playing the browns, dolphins, bills, and rams, play the cowboys, packers, seahawks and panthers, then they would have a slim shot at being a dynasty.
2007-12-03 17:25:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Uh...They already are a dynasty with 3 Super Bowls in 4 years (2001-2004)
2007-12-03 17:12:57 · answer #8 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The filming became into caught and stopped in the 1st minute of play of the Jets sport. in case you experience like putting an asterisk go forward and make somewhat chart on your mattress room and positioned each and every of the rankings of their video games on it and place an asterisk the place you will like. the finished filming ingredient has given the Patriots a extensive motivation to guard their coach, it variety of feels like the Pats oppposition is suffering extra from the scandal than the Pats.
2016-10-10 05:07:00 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Patriots are already a dynasty for the 2000's, undefeated season or not.
2007-12-03 17:09:11 · answer #10 · answered by Justin T 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
A dynasty with a little * saying...."spy gate" and the SECOND team to go undefeated.
*EDIT* Yes, you're right Wondermom. I mean if the BOSTON Globe writes an article about how the Pats didn't really cheat, then I must believe it....As a former newspaper writer, all I can say is subjectivity is way to common in mainstream newspapers..
2007-12-03 17:07:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋