i would be interested to know what you think?

Question

Do you remember February 1993 in England , when a
young boy of 3 was taken from a Liverpool shopping
centre by two 10-year-old boys?
Jamie Bulger walked away from his mother for only
a second, Jon Venables took his hand and led him out
of the mall with his friend Robert Thompson. They took
Jamie on a walk for over 2 and a half miles, along the
way stopping every now and again to
torture the poor little boy who was crying
constantly for his mummy.
Finally they stopped at a railway track where they
brutally kicked him, threw stones at him, rubbed paint
in his eyes, pushed batteries up his anus and cut his
fingers off with scissors. Other mutilations were
inflicted but not reported in the press.

N.B. :- Remember, a 3year old cannot possibly
defend themselves against a 10 year old, let alone of
2 them.

What these two boys did was so horrendous that
Jamie's mother was forbidden to identify his body.
They then left his beaten small body on railway
tracks so a train could run him over to hide the mess
they had created. These two boys, even being boys,
understood what they did was wrong, hence trying to
make it look like an accident.

This week Lady Justice Butler-Sloss has awarded
the two boys ( now men ), anonymity for the rest of
their lives when they leave custody with new
identities. They will also leave custody early only
serving just over half of their sentence.
They are being relocated to Australia to live out
the rest of their lives. They disgustingly and
violently took Jamie's life away and in return they
each get a new life!

Mimkat,i personaly think you are way out,but will check it out anyway.

yeah u r right Mimkat,seems they are out soz,but the question still stands.for i find it strange i knew nothing about it,but ive bin going through some bad times,so maybe i missed it. thanks for pointing it out to me(lets not fall out)

Answer 1

This is one f*cked up country F*ckin' PC brigade need to be strung up by their balls and t*ts.

Answer 2

Where is the money coming from to re locate them to Australia out of the tax payers pocket no doubt.
It is scum like this that could tempt a reasonable man into believing in capital punishment.
I don't think they should be given the opportunity to leave and walk away from the irreversible pain they have caused the
Bulger family , they have served their prison sentence but they should not rewarded for doing this . No doubt one of the justifications of Butler Sloss might be that by relocating them she is averting the possibility of the men re ofending or falling into a life of crime . She should find them work placement in this country and support them in social rehabilitation here where they can face up to the heinous crime that they have done. of course their are issues with the press and their safety however I believe a man should have to live with his actions and it should not fall on society to protect him indefinitely from the realty of what he has done.
Where ever they go what ever they do out of their wage packet and for the rest of their working life they should have to pay back to society specifically to the Bulgier family and if they didn't want this then they the two men should be obliged to pay into a victims fund for victims of crimes such as theirs.

Answer 3

yeah I have read the whole story years ago, and it shocked me.
But I am not sure what I would do with those kids.
I read about the way they were raised and I thought the parents should have got charged as well.

I was wondering "if they were already able to do such a horrofying crime when they were little, how are they going to be when they are grown up??"
But I don't know those kids, I don't know any background Information. So I dont know, if giving them a chance for a new life is good or bad.

Answer 4

I would've liked for them both to be taken back to the railway line and had some rocks, paint, batteries & scissors laid out to frighten them into thinking how little Jamie would have felt.
I bet they would've cried like the cowards they are.
There is no punishment good enough for them since hanging was abolished.

Answer 5

THIS IS NOT UP TO DATE INFORMATION & it's been doing the rounds in email boxes for years. They were released a few years ago, yes it was horrendous what they did but we can we please leave that poor baby in peace now? The 2 murderers have got new lives whether we like it or not. One even has a child of his own now, allegedly. I would be happy for them to rot to in hell but if I get this out of date email one more time I'm going to scream. Emails like this where people "sign a petition" & forward to many friends are just a way for marketing agencies to collect your email address & use it for spam.

Answer 6

this is soooo terrible i feel for that little boy, especially cutting off his fingers, mothers have to be more careful nowadays because once that child is gone out of site, people have TIME to do all that toture to them.

i think those boys should have been on an execution life sentence, like stay in jail and then when they are old enough they will be executed.

Answer 7

What had these two ten year olds been subject to that they could even think of such a deed? My guess is they were subject to some severe abuse themselves to get to such a state. At ten years old I would be looking for who abused them.

Answer 8

well im totally disgusted with this, why should they be able to live their lives like that, have their freedom when that poor little boy lost his life because of those two? i feel so sorry for the little boys mom. but what can any of us do about it, there is nothing, its our stupid country again and its pathetic laws!

Answer 9

yes, I remember that terrible news. Those boys were evil beyond belief. I hope that someone, somewhere, discovers their true identity and makes their lives a living hell.

Answer 10

a million) global Cricket - The Day-nighttime attempt tournament :- in contact or no longer - no longer in contact 2) T20 in Olympic video games close to destiny :- in contact or no longer - in contact 3) Brett-Lee lower back in action in global area :- in contact or no longer - Very Very in contact 4) Your crew performed with Zimbabwe or Kenya for a 7 ODI :- in contact or no longer - no longer a lot in contact 5) Cricket gamers in a commercial or performing :- in contact or no longer - in the adventure that they play then in contact 6) 'loose-hit' rule for no ball in attempt cricket :- in contact or no longer - no longer in contact 7) distinctive the retired large gamers like Shane Warne,Adam Gilchrist in global matches :- in contact or no longer - no longer in contact 8) Subcontinental communities (in a unmarried crew) v/s different all countries (in a unmarried crew):- in contact or no longer - in contact 9) New Zealand crew in no:a million position in next 5 years or so :- in contact or no longer - in contact 10) Pakistan crew captained the side by ability of Younis Khan :- in contact or no longer - Very in contact