Herr Bush has his own agenda; nothing he does should come as a surprise.
If Bush wants to grab the Middle East oil fields, he will say anything to rationalize his actions to the American people.
Why did we invade Afghanistan, an act we condemned the then-Soviet Union for 20 years prior? Because they would not allow us to send our military into their country, invading their sovereign nation, overturn every rock, in our search for the mythical Osama Bin-Laden.
Why did we topple the Iraqi government and occupy Iraq for almost five years? Because Hussein's government had WMD's.
Why are we going to invade Iran? Because it's leader says naughty things about the US government, and must be developing WMD, since they know how to develop nuclear power.
Does anyone else see a trend here?
2007-12-03 23:30:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by MenifeeManiac 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush and Cheney has no proof of Iran's intensions...the IAEE confirmed Iran has no ability to make a nuke with the technology they're using.
Even though the NIE contradicts Bush rhetoric, they have no credibility! According to the article:
"The shift in the intelligence community's thinking on Iran comes five years after a flawed NIE concluded neighboring Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction -- a report that helped pave the way for the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003."
So I would not go with Bush admin or the NIE findings - neither party has credibility.
2007-12-04 04:54:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jerry H 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
It doesn't matter to me what 16 intelligence reports say; Fox News told me that Iran has nucular weapons of massest destruction and they have no spin. They even had a fancy graphic that said Showdown with Iran practically counting down the days to war. They wouldn't spend that much money on a graphic if they were not absolutely positive. Maybe G Dub should talk to O'Reilly, he can give him the accurate intel.
For an excellent chronology of Iran's nuclear program see:
http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Iran/1819.html
2007-12-03 23:52:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
incredibly - My ineffective severe trouble-free opinion is that it brings me lower back to thinking approximately what i replaced into taught correct to Hitler. Volumes of imagery in books exhibiting all the disparity of Jewish prisoners, the gas chambers, the trains, the shooting of individuals ideal interior the face, raping, pillaging, killing... All because of the fact Hitler needed a grasp race. for approximately 4 years now i assumed it replaced into humorous how lots of democrat/liberals call Bush a Hitler equivalent... even regardless of the undeniable fact that it is not humorous anymore, that's some severe stuff. human beings in our very own united states of america who examine Bush to Hitler needless to say don't understand they're sounding-off greater comparable to ways Hitler spoke and acted than everyone else here on the face of the planet. It concerns me.
2016-10-19 02:23:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush's brain: Arab and Persian-Bad. Jew and Christian-gooooood.
He'll do whatever is necessary to justify slaughtering Arabs and Persians to secure the Holy Land from Muslims.
2007-12-03 16:27:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by CaesarLives 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Read today's news bubba....it seems that he defused that argument today...announcing that Iran was not working on a nuclear bomb....hummmm right after last weeks Middle
east summit....
2007-12-03 16:24:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mike C 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, I have not heard him say anything resembling "war rhetoric". And the report does not say the Iranians are not going to build Atomic weapons. Matter of fact all this report says is that the people writing it have no idea what Iran is going to do. how much do these people get paid to say "we don't know"?
2007-12-03 16:26:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
5⤋
This is the second times in recent years.
They might be fabricating this and that, who knows?
But it was not right.
2007-12-03 16:29:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by chanljkk 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it doesn't. He does things to suit HIS needs and agenda...not the needs of the US of A.
Now you know why they call him Chimp. It is about HIS survival...not the betterment of America.
2007-12-03 17:25:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Fedup Veteran 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
I have always said and continue to say that when chimp opens his mouth, you switch off and or believe exactly the opposite to what he has just said.... PERIOD
2007-12-03 16:29:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dream Realized 2
·
6⤊
1⤋