2007-12-03 15:51:22 · 13 answers · asked by Kelly B 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nope
2007-12-03 16:01:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely they both would have, especially Clinton. People forget that Clinton wasn't some crazy liberal, he was a dealmaker. The guy supported getting stuff done over being a "rah rah" Democrat. Granted, 9/11 would not have been the catalyst, because 9/11 had nothing to do with Iraq, but I definitely think Clinton would have eventually gone after Saddam again, sure. P.S. Clinton had a plan drawn up and ready to go in December of 2000 to do basically every non-Iraq War on Terror thing Bush has done. The whole Afghanistan thing would have happened by February 2001 if Clinton was still in office.
2016-05-28 02:26:24 · answer #2 · answered by doris 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, and he wouldn't have gone to war in Afghanistan, either. He would have ignored the problem, just like Clinton did. And we would have been attacked again, and again.
Bush mishandled the War in Iraq, there's no denying it. But it was still the right thing to do, and I feel safer in my bed because of it.
Vote for Rudy!
2007-12-03 16:11:58 · answer #3 · answered by Rick K 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Heck no, but you can bet, that had this scenario been in effect, he would have gone to Ben Laden, and 'blackmailed him' into buying 'carbon credits' to offset the 'green house gasses' emitted by the falling towers.
Of course, it is becoming known now, that the 'company' selling the 'carbon credits' just happens to belong to ----who else? AL GORE,Jr.
2007-12-04 03:03:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wasss up Kelly B,
Haven't heard from you in while...
Your friend Venom of course...
But legitimate question..indeed..
Hard to say, hindsight is always easy...
I honestly could not tell you what Mr. VP would have done. I guess it really doesn't matter, doesn't
Good question...I'll give you a star.
See, I can be nice
2007-12-03 16:06:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Albert Gore Jr's role model is Chamberlain "make a disaster and wait for someone else to clean it up" so no he would not have stopped Saddam.
2007-12-03 16:05:31 · answer #6 · answered by phillipk_1959 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Of course not. Al Gore can sell animal poo to a zoo keeper. Guess who the zoo keepers are? We the people.
2007-12-03 15:57:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Only the try and prove his junk "Gorebal Warming" BS . I can hear him now " See , I told you it was hot in the desert " !!
2007-12-05 18:15:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
FACT
Al Gore was the first public figure to oppose the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
So, my answer is no.
2007-12-03 15:54:53 · answer #9 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋
absolutely not...he wouldnt even have been thinking about iraq
2007-12-03 16:36:30 · answer #10 · answered by moderation 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋