English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-03 13:30:21 · 13 answers · asked by shiningStar 2 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Duh, because Chavez is trying to become another dictator when the country used to have free elections, well they still do for now.

2007-12-03 13:37:43 · answer #1 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 1 1

Why should we give a damn about who other people elect as their leader and what form of government they choose? Since when did we become so high and mighty as to believe that we know what is best for everyone else? If it is a mistake on the part of the people of Venezuela it is theirs to make.

2007-12-03 13:38:19 · answer #2 · answered by UriK 5 · 2 1

i haven't considered the action picture yet have examine lots of the makers writing (John Pilger). the US has antagonistic democracy in South united states of america because of the fact puppet governments enable US companies to make the main South American labour and puppet governments enable the US to make the main the commerce relationship with South united states of america. The CIA have already admitted involvement in attempting to overthrow Chavez, who's as you rightly say a democratically elected chief!!! the US government are at pains to demonise him and portray him as some sort of Stalin determine whilst he replaced into infact elected with greater beneficial majorities than any President ought to ever wish to get. the reason being that Chavez like the different leaders have realised that previous dictatorships have exploited the individuals and stored them unfavourable. incredibly than persevering with this vogue Chavez needs to apply venezuelan wealth to advance the lives of the unfavourable (the various) and not merely the lives of the wealthy (the wealthy). that's thoroughly against US doctrine which promotes capitalism and does not decide to assist the unfavourable and needy. Chavez is a socialist yet in contrast to Marx or the different socialist. Chavez needs the individuals to assist theselves yet he can help them in doing so. an exciting statistic is that there is now one hundred% literacy in Venezuela as consequently literacy courses presented by using Chavez. anybody now has a shot at user-friendly education. Chavez needs to apply the rustic's extensive oil wealth to advance the rustic as an entire incredibly than merely lining the wallet of the rustic's ideal oil experts (US sort). maximum individuals human beings voters merely can no longer face up to the certainty their governments have supported various brutal dictators in countless South Ameruican countries that have delivered approximately the deaths of hundreds. the US purely help democracy on their words (consequently they do no longer help Chavez who replaced into democratically elected). the US additionally concern the capacity of South united states of america. South united states of america is a dozing substantial. If it have been to unite interior an identical way as Europe has then they may be a considerable capacity interior the area. As all of us comprehend, the US must be purely huge youngster on the block and could no longer stand by using idly because of the fact the recent youngster stakes his declare. Even now Bush helps the Colombian government which utilises deaths squads.

2016-10-19 01:51:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I wouldn't 'oppose' it, though I know what you mean. I would be saddened for the Venezuelan people for being duped into voting for communism. Chavez is not a social Democrat. He worships Fidel Castro, a dictator whose people are impoverished. He's trying to consolidate dictatorial powers for himself, much like Putin and Bush. I'm happy for Venezuelans that they proved to be wiser than Russians and Americans by voting for personal freedoms.

Remember that Chavez could be the sweetest guy in the world, but those dictatorial powers would be inherited by future leaders. It's easy to grant such power to the govt. It's much more difficult to take them away.

2007-12-03 13:40:20 · answer #4 · answered by CaesarLives 5 · 4 2

Socialism by definition means that a significant segement of the population loses their natural rights to liberty and freedom from statist intervention.

That sucks

2007-12-03 13:38:16 · answer #5 · answered by spicymnguy 5 · 2 1

too many Americans have an ill informed concept of what socialism is. you have to keep it simple for them...their thinking goes like this...capitalism good, socialism bad. most don't even realize Venezuela is a major supplier of oil for them.

2007-12-03 13:42:57 · answer #6 · answered by bilez1 4 · 0 2

Hugo isn't trying to make a socialist state. How do you say Fuhrer in Spanish?

2007-12-03 13:38:47 · answer #7 · answered by sammael_coh 4 · 1 2

Because they support a Fascist America.

2007-12-03 13:33:54 · answer #8 · answered by Dangerous Dad 5 · 0 1

Of course not. After their economy collasped the price of oil would drop.

2007-12-03 13:39:54 · answer #9 · answered by phillipk_1959 6 · 1 0

You meant 'Totalitarian' Venezuela, right?

2007-12-03 13:32:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Because it's socialist.

2007-12-03 13:34:17 · answer #11 · answered by Batman 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers