Anyone else think Saddam Hussein moved the WMD's in the 15 month run up to the inspections?

Question

Common sense anyone?

Answer 1

Saddam's top general, Georges Sada, wrote a book about the moving of the nuclear and WMD production equipment to Syria. Hans Blix's own report of February 2003 stated that a lot of WMD materials went missing that they had documented in Iraq before they were barred in 1998.

We have already found in Iraq over 500 of those chemical artillery shells that Saddam used to wipe out villages, so he didn't get them all out of country before our troops rolled in.

Answer 2

This is question has political overtones and therefor it will be answered according to how you lean politically but the facts can be retrieved easily on the web Syria has refused U.N. requests eleven times since 2002 for inspections relating to Dr. John Reynolds concerns due to four mass inventories relating to WMDs found at El Ha bar in Iraq,if Syria has nothing to hide why not let in the inspectors and put the concerns to rest,also missing is the fourteen pages that were redacted in the U.N. weapons inspection teams report first edited by British chemist Jerald Newlon who has stated under oath that those pages were in fact the bases for the British intelligence concerning WMDs at El Ha bar,Jerald Newlon quit his U.N. position in protest after they were excluded from the final report presented to the U.N. if the U.N. has nothing to hide post or release to fourteen pages in their entirety. But in the end no one will believe different you either support the war because you like President Bush ,or you detest the war because you detest President Bush,the facts make little difference

Answer 3

He in no way had any, while will you get that by using your head? The wmds subject became a farce, why no longer carry Bush to blame? important over politics! Bush used a forged document to diminish back up his claims, — the Niger Uranium document. He knew the document became forged on the grounds that he despatched retired Ambassador Joseph Wilson in 2002-02 to Niger to verify. A document to sell yellowcake could require the signature of the best minister, the forgoing minister and the minister of mines. no one had signed this manner of document and further each and all the yellowcake were presold to the eastern and Europeans. there became no way that extensive quantity of 500 a good deal would have been shunted. Wilson wrote approximately this in an op-ed interior the long island cases 2003-07-06. somebody interior the Bush camp (probably Karl Rove) retaliated by using day trip Wilson's spouse, Valerie Plame, as a CIA agent, to that end endangering her existence and the lives of operatives who labored together with her. Jeff Gannon and Bob Novak revealed the day trip and refused to call the source. there have been no WMDs. Even FOX information introduced the formal end to the hunt. the main suitable CIA Duelfer document stated there in no way have been any, and none have been moved to Syria (yet another Bush lie). It became no longer purely that Bush stated he had evidence of WMDs, he claimed good evidence. If he had good evidence, the place are they? there have been no drones, no nuclear centrifuges, no gasoline, no biologicals, no nukes, no plutonium, no uranium, actually no longer something! In his 2003-01-28 State Of the Union Speech, Bush talked particularly of “38,000 liters of botulinum toxin — adequate to issue hundreds of thousands of people to loss of life by using respiration failure” and ”500 a lot of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.”. He additionally claimed he knew the place those issues became. Bush employed John Bolton to rub down the information, and notice to it that no-one else observed the uncooked intelligence. See Chain Of Command. Bush skipped over the advice of the CIA. See Chain Of Command. Senator Sam Levin released previously categorised records that undercut appropriate Bush pre-Iraq war claims of a link between Saddam Hussein's regime and the al-Qaeda terrorist community.

Answer 4

Obviously, he did. It is a historical fact that he not only had such weapons but used them. Think about it. What chance would you have of finding these weapons in an area as big as Texas. The hiding place could be on the surface, in any kind of structure or a mile or more underground. Not being able to find them does not negate the historical fact that they exist. That does not mean that we should be occupying Iraq. Two separate issues.

Answer 5

No, only a complete moron would believe that! He did not have a weapons of mass destruction program. All he had were some old missiles that were falling apart. Give it up dude. The invasion of Iraq was one of the biggest fiascos in American history. Stop wasting your time defending the moron, Bush's, decision to invade Iraq. Move on! Next question!

Answer 6

Where are they? Intelligence has proven that they are not in Syria. And, Saddam hated Iran so they aren't there. No, no one in their right mind believes he moved the WMD's because we and the intelligence knows there weren't any WMD's.

Answer 7

If he had moved them...don't you think we would have spotted them? I mean...we even saw mobile homes and decided they were chemical weapons labs on wheels (but they in fact were just RV's). And all the scientists we have captured and tortured......oops, sorry - enhanced interrogated, said there were no WMD programs.

Common sense? Quit listening to Rush and Sean.

Answer 8

Given that Hans Blix indicated that the Iraqis did not seem to have any evidence that they were going to be inspected, not me.

Might I remind you that after the war, Suddam's papers were taken and read by the US forces that stormed Baghdad, so I am sure that if he did have WMDs, then they surely would have been accounted for.

Answer 9

No. The UN inspectors accounted for 90+ percent of the WMD's before the invasion.

Answer 10

Yeah we found them in Syria it was on the news.