Yes, he dealt with some Mexicans while Governor of Arkansas.
2007-12-03 12:14:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alex G 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
It seems to me that foreign policy is a province of the State Dept.
Congressman on a Foreign Relations committee might be next most experienced followed by state governors that might have worked on Trade deals (not foreign policy).
Living in a foreign country as a pre-teen or sightseeing under the guise of government official isn't experience either.
2007-12-03 14:07:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by witz1960 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. He only worked in state government.
I would rather see him win in Iowa than Romney because he probably can only win in Iowa and Arkansas.
Pat Robertson received more votes than George Bush Sr. in Iowa in 1988.
I think Ron Paul has a chance of winning in Iowa.
During the third quarter, Paul received more itemized contributions (donations exceeding $200) than both Giuliani and Romney in 7 states: Washington, New Mexico, Kansas, North Dakota, Montana, Alaska, and Hawaii. [45] [46] [47] In Iowa he received only 2 percent less itemized contributions than Romney, the winner of the straw poll. Forty-nine percent of Paul's total contributions was from donations not exceeding $200 and therefore was not included in the state totals for the quarter. [48] Eighteen percent of Romney's total contributions was not included. [49] Only eleven percent of Giuliani's total contributions was not included. [50] With donations of $200 or less included, it can be estimated that Paul received more contributions than both Giuliani and Romney in an additional 5 states: Iowa, Wisconsin, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Nebraska. It also can be estimated that he only received one eighth (1/8) less than than Romney, the leader, in New Hampshire.
2007-12-04 06:45:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eric Inri 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If we made a itemizing of former presidents without distant places family members adventure, it could be long. The sitting president has none, and he's not doing so nicely. the previous president had none, and he did ok. Ronald Reagan had none, and he did ok. the considerable factor to look at is who his advisors would be. And besides the reality that he only reported some names on MSNBC this morning, there became no indication that the folk he reported (John Bolton between others) could easily be in his cabinet.
2016-11-13 10:34:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mike Huckabee does not have foreign policy experience, But he does understand that we are losing jobs because of the unfair trading and "unlike Hillary" he will help fix the trading arena.
2007-12-04 06:56:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stars and Stripes 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
At least as much as the last governor of Arkansas to run for the Presidency had. Which, obviously, was not enough.
2007-12-04 12:39:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Boomer Wisdom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe not, but he exhibits common sense and honesty regarding this foreign policy issue :
"Every time we put our credit card in the gas pump, we're paying so that the Saudis get rich — filthy, obscenely rich, and that money then ends up going to funding madrassas," schools "that train the terrorists," said Huckabee. "America has allowed itself to become enslaved to Saudi oil. It's absurd. It's embarrassing."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21973287/
2007-12-03 12:19:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
None to speak of. It's one area he's really lacking in.
2007-12-04 02:07:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Worse - he's another globalist who loves illegals.
2007-12-04 02:27:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he's exchanged dollars for Euros once at the Rome airport.
2007-12-03 11:49:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋