Actually they have been doing it for some time now.If u check a news report recently u would find that there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING suspicous since 2003 about nuke weapons.
Well dubya and cheney can always come up with new brainwash methods but i strongly doubt this time they would be able to start another war based on lies
2007-12-03 11:11:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5
·
5⤊
4⤋
After the Gulf war, Iraq and UN signed an agreements affirming that if Iraq violated any of them, Iraq could be depose. Iraq violated 17 UN resolutions out of the 22 resolutions while Iraq fired on U.S. warplanes that have been patrolling no-fly-zones almost usual(an act of war or perhaps Saddam presented $14,000 for any U.S. warplanes being shot down), persevering with to oppress the Kurds and Shiites(yet another violation), and throwing out UN inspectors many cases(additionally a contravention)? there became in no way end to the Gulf war, it became a ceasefire settlement as long Iraq and the US the two respected the settlement yet Iraq of course did no longer. particularly, many western intels claims that Saddam became procuring yellowcakes from Niger, alleging restarting his WMDs software. UN 687 cleary stated to "fix peace and protection to the section". it extremely is why we invaded. UN 1441 made it a legal conflict. It does not require a further decision if Iraq became the breach of 1441(which it did), it in uncomplicated terms demands the U.S. to talk the issue returned. because of the fact the UN did no longer enforce their resolutions interior the 90s(and returned in 2003 while they did no longer enforce it and nonetheless won't do something) and Iraq did no longer comply all over returned, the US became in the rights to flow in Iraq. Plus he's not a war criminal as you made him out to be. it is not against the regulation to attack a rustic devoid of UN approval. The UN can't tell what international locations we would desire to do as we are a sovereign us of a. It only say that the UN voted we can't assist you. Why? look on the oil-for-nutrition scandal of what the UN became doing.
2016-11-13 10:29:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by tschannen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course he will. He already has. He has been beating the war drum for months now about Iran trying to rally his faithful supporters into fearing a nuclear Iran.
2007-12-03 11:25:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, and ignore intelligence that shines a light on the Saudi role in global Islamic terrorism.
.
2007-12-03 11:13:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
of course.
nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons require two different processes in general; the technology of one does not equate to the other any more than a toaster can change your flat tire. Likewise the radioactive material necessary for nuclear weapons is of a much more difficult to produce variety than the fuel nuclear power plants can use. Weapons-grade plutonium is not what you are gonig to find at Three Mile Island or any other power plant.
Bush and company have given absolutely no reason to suggest they are being any more honest than they were last fiasco.
2007-12-03 11:12:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
of course, what you think he will grow a conscience now? you think he will feel guilty for the murder of women and children in Iraq?
Bush is a demon and should be hung, drawn and quartered
a
2007-12-03 14:17:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Antoni 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
You somehow missed it, but the Democrats also believed the Intelligence Reports, and DEMANDED that Bush do something about Saddam.
I was against it, because I knew the Democrats would Surrender and Support the Enemy.
Just like they did in Nam.
(Do you still believe that Women didn't get the right to vote until the 60's???????????)
That's what Democrats do-----Betray.
Will you Democrats still Hate America, even after you take over in 2009?
2007-12-03 11:11:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by dinamuk 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
THE IEG just reported (see yahoo news) that Iran has halted its Nuclear program a few years back..and is not aggressively pursuing nuclear bombs AS BUSH AND CHENNEY HAVE ALWAYS REPEATED.
This is yet another deception that bush has always used.
Like the littlee whiny brat COLBERT made him out to be during that 06 correspondents dinner roasting.
ANd today Bush comes full fledge kicking and screaming -- everything but falling to the ground aand tossing a tantrum -- about dems this dems that -- AND DOESNT EVEN STAY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS
Thats terrible leader right there.
Cant face the firing squad and stand up to the questions.
Put the fork in the lame duck...hes done!
P.S. I think bush jut ensured that he wont be getting all his money for the war (or should I say to retrofit the bombers we have so they can bomb Iran)
2007-12-03 11:07:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by writersbIock2006 5
·
6⤊
6⤋
I am not qualified to dictate what happens in someone else's imaginary world...
2007-12-03 11:15:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by u_bin_called 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Can you show me an administration that hasn't done just that with what ever fiasco they may be responsible for?
2007-12-03 11:13:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
2⤊
3⤋