How many more times will an agency have to do so before Bush supporters wake up and get a clue that the Admin. is cherry-picking what it wants and discarding actual truths and facts in order to make it's case?
-EPA Global Warming Report
-NIE Estimate on terrorism
-NASA Global Warming Report
-Medicare Prescription Drug costs
-NIE on Iran's nuclear weapons program
-9/11 Comission on Iraq's involvement in WTC attack
Just to list a few......
2007-12-03 10:58:09 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Edit: I am a registered Republican. Non-partisan enough to look at the facts objectively.
2007-12-03 11:07:06 · update #1
Remember Bush is getting his information from a higher source that is telling him stuff like "George go and get those Islamic terrorists and set the Iraqi people free."
And he said By God I'm gonna do it too!!
Edit: I appreciate the fact that you are looking at it objectively. So do I. The time has come now for Bush supporters to question this mans motives. Does he really believe that this is Armageddon? I think this question has taken on more serious implications now that we know Bush has known the truth about Iran for quite sometime. Is it about the oil or is it religious?
2007-12-03 11:05:04 · answer #1 · answered by Enigma 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NASA- That organization had the scientist who was bought off by Soros to say Bush was silencing him.
NASA also reporting that all the planets are warming up.
NIE- Read the whole report you will notice that guess what Iran stop their nuclear project because of the sanctions and has no assurance that it has stop.
Bush never claim that Iraq was directly connect to 9/11. If you were paying attention he was saying that Iraq was part of the same mindset that cause 9/11. The explosive expert from the 1st WTC attack fled to ready for this? IRAQ
EPA- Now there is winner group for you that when San Diego decide to clean up the river that separated US and Mexico was stop by the EPA because they believe that the sewage in the river may have created a environment for animals living in it.
You are the one who is cherry picking.
Now go make some cherry juice.
2007-12-03 11:23:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uh - uh. They were dirty long before ' Mistah Butch ' got there. ( No, that doesn't excuse his actions. ) Here, look these up: " The Book of Guys " ( George Bush ) By Garrison Keillor ( Many a truth is said in jest indeed! ) Also: Johnny Roselli Sam Giancanna Kennedy assasination websites. ' The Killing Of A President ' Always remember that what amounts to a clandestine arm of repression is really, a conspiracy service to those in higher power. The propaganda services and political police are the only thing that lend them any illusory credibility. There are few who can match The 300 Spartans for honor. Part of the reason for Czar Nichola's unjustified fall and the communist takeover. Napoleon had his Fouche. It's a bad sign when everybody wants to take down just one guy, but is blithely ignorant of the machine that keeps him on the throne. The Praetorian Guard did away with Emperors if they proved too obstreperous. Read about Claudius. It's all there.
2016-05-28 01:27:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the problem is on those reports that people like you cherry pick and don't bother to read the whole thing. Don't tell me you are a Republican, I have heard such statements before.According to the whole story it explained what happened. the whole report basically says they don't know what is going in in Iran right now. If i was the president i would most certainly look at the worst case rather than the best.
2007-12-03 11:38:20 · answer #4 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Right..and you know what we are going to find out far far too late?.
That Bush was right all along.
I am assuming this is going to happen when a friggin moron like Romney or Guliani or Clinton gets into office. You just watch the amount of terror attacks that start hittin the US
when ANY of the current loser candidates get into office. Not one of them has a backbone.
2007-12-03 11:03:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Supreme Court overturning military tribunals
2007-12-03 11:00:25 · answer #6 · answered by C.S. 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If the facts don't fit the agenda change the facts.
2007-12-03 11:29:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush and his cronies have their own agendas and facts play no part in their actions.
2007-12-03 11:09:31 · answer #8 · answered by LR 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know how many times the independent government agencies have been wrong about those things.
2007-12-03 11:01:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋