Do you make any distinction between a ban imposed by the government or a ban imposed by the manager?
Let me know if you smoke also, or if it depends on who you are going with if visiting.
2007-12-03 10:28:12 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Dining Out ➔ United States ➔ Other - US Dining Out
I smoke a pack a week. Tennessee just passed a statewide ban on smoking in restaurants and I do not mind. I never smoke in a restaurant anyway.... however, when I visit a bar I love to be able to smoke.
A ban on smoking in a place that servers more than appetizers is fine to me, just please let me have a cig while drinking at a bar :)
2007-12-03 12:05:16 · answer #1 · answered by Rhiannon S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It wouldn't move me either way if smoking were banned or not. I think the only way to really know in an area where it isn't a government ban is to actually call the restaurant and ask. I can personally say that I don't know anyone who calls restaurants to find out if they ban smoking.
I do like it when I am in a smoke free area. I smoke cigarettes from time to time, but that doesn't mean when I'm eating I don't mind smoke. I hate it when someone is smoking and the smoke blows in my face or into my area.
2007-12-05 02:17:04 · answer #2 · answered by Jarrett R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would be more likely to visit or work in a bar or restaurant if smoking was prohibited, whether it was by government ban or manager edict. I am allergic to smoke to the point that I can get sick from smelling it on other people's clothing. I don't smoke although I used to smoke 2 packs a day at one time!
2007-12-03 18:48:57 · answer #3 · answered by Iowa Woman 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am a smoker and my family do not visit places we cant smoke. ie My grand parents cant stand the cold, my parents or wife either.
I have also changed my job from DJ and Office worker to a mobile rep and self employed programmer so I can live normally. I have a better quality of life excliding pubs but the rest of the family don't get out now.
2007-12-05 22:33:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. I live in Colorado and on July 1, 2006, they imposed a state-wide smoking ban. For me, it has made going out much more enjoyable.
Why should the non-smokers have to be subject to health problems that smokers create for them?
No distinction. Smoke-free is smoke-free.
2007-12-03 18:37:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I am more likely to go to a bar if there isn't smoking. I don't smoke although I did at one time for a little while. I think it is nastey and when who leave you and your clothes stink. Its so sick.
2007-12-04 10:47:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer non smoking
2007-12-03 18:50:08 · answer #7 · answered by Ellie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't smoke.
Couldn't care less either way.
Government banning use of a legal substance in a private business is unconstitutional, period.
2007-12-03 18:50:01 · answer #8 · answered by worldinspector 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The ban was a good thing and we go out more.My son has asthma and it was very bad for him before.
2007-12-03 20:24:54 · answer #9 · answered by Aloha_Ann 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wouldnt go in if I could not smoke shizzel....
2007-12-03 18:31:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋