English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071203/ts_nm/iran_usa_dc

bunch of liars and corrupt politicians, politics has nothing to do with morality but more with the law of the jungle, or perhaps survival of the fittest?

2007-12-03 09:38:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

They didn't lie!!!

2007-12-03 09:41:39 · answer #1 · answered by pip 7 · 0 2

between the important alterations in any of the present concerns international is international help. Even the lax French stepped in peacekeeping efforts in Lebanon. The Hezbollah militants have been many times funded by potential of Iran to dedicate terrorist acts. you have each good to think of what you want with regard to the media, yet mutually as there has been and consistently would be a debate because of the fact the the unfairness of the U. S. media to the left or to the suitable, i've got heard little complaint of excellent-wing bias in international components such because of the fact the enormous apple circumstances, BBC, and so forth. while and if the UN imposes sanctions against Iran, the genuine attempt of Iran's willingness to cooperate with the international in a venture of peace will initiate.

2016-12-17 06:06:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Their biggest problem is credibility both at home and abroad. Because of Iraq and the misleading information about wmd's and that Iraq was behind 9/11 there is real doubt about all the info this administration gives out on Iran.

2007-12-03 09:58:11 · answer #3 · answered by Robert S 5 · 0 0

Yes, they will lie (and are lying) for Iran as well.

There is absolutely NO PROOF that Iran poses a threat to the soverneighty of the USA.

Yet, the beat of the war drum continues unabated and the ignorant masses dance in ecstasy.

2007-12-03 09:45:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Interesting that it was the NIE report that liberals claim was a lie against Iraq but now they report (sort of) in favor of the democrat position and you applaud them.

ofcourse the sort of is a quantifyer that people who actually READ THE ENTIRE REPORT already know.

A. We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons
program (1)

(1) For the purposes of this Estimate, by “nuclear weapons program” we mean Iran’s nuclear weapon design
and weaponization work and covert uranium conversion-related and uranium enrichment-related work; we
do not mean Iran’s declared civil work related to uranium conversion and enrichment.

"We judge with high confidence that the halt lasted at least several years. (Because of
intelligence gaps discussed elsewhere in this Estimate, however, DOE and the NIC
assess with only moderate confidence that the halt to those activities represents a halt to Iran's entire nuclear weapons program.)"

2007-12-03 09:45:28 · answer #5 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0 3

They would... but thank GOD the NIE has done a good job to stub the president's potential attempt to initiate an invasion in Iran.

2007-12-03 09:42:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Of course BUsh is LYING, he's been doing it all along. If the Repubes support his delusions, then these people are hopeless. Repubes/Cons are so easily manipulated if you play the fear card.

2007-12-03 09:42:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

If evil men can make money at it, they'll lie at all costs.

2007-12-03 09:42:08 · answer #8 · answered by George W. B 3 · 2 3

They are trying to.

2007-12-03 09:51:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Anything is possible.

2007-12-03 09:43:19 · answer #10 · answered by Bubba 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers