Same welcome return. Ask the OLD "frank" - he's SURE to know.....either that or marvin, greg and all the others - and I see Harvey's about again too so no doubt we're in for yet another round of the old OLD O L D questions over and OVER and O V E R again
2007-12-05 02:17:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by nosmo king 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hi Frank.
You trying a New persona BUT with the same ol question ~ again!
Try reading some of the many earlier answers ...save you the time n energy or re-writing the same ol' one(s.
Make sure you eject anyone from the Public facility - before it closes and locks up for the night. It looks better that way.
Sash.
2007-12-04 13:10:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by sashtou 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Lucky
2007-12-03 17:04:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by FC 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Intelligent by His own standards, I assume, and a musician too? What are the odds eh? The term I would use is 'Flake', or 'Workshy Fop'.
2007-12-03 17:13:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
"serious crack up", that remains as sad with this question as he has been for the last 6 months
w*nker?
mmmm...uneducated fool with no degree thats still bigging himself up to paper over his insecurities ?
legend in his own lunch time?
bit of a pervert that enjoys the insults as much as the praise?
victim of insecure attachment?
you choose mate :-)
2007-12-04 11:09:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by bletherskyte 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
there isn't a term but you would describe the person as having natural talent or creme de la creme
2007-12-03 17:37:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by poetressus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Common Sense dictates, the term is "Exceptional"
2007-12-03 17:09:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Maninder k 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Inborn prodigy?
2007-12-03 19:47:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by wacky_racer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Egotistical, grandiose, conceited?
2007-12-03 17:36:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I like your determination
2007-12-03 20:15:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by jingles 3
·
0⤊
0⤋