She wants to be all things to all people. This is wrong because you can't.
2007-12-03 07:26:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by David_the_Great 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No matter how she answered the question someone would make a big fat hairy deal out of it. The question was stupid and has nothing in the way of relevance to Sentator Clinton's campaign. Even by not answering the question people are making a big fat hairy deal out of it. Some people have nothing better to do, I guess. Instead of asking questions about her stand on the global warming issue or forrest management, which would relate to the bag issue, or about environmental clean up issues specifically the woman asks her paper or plastic. That seems rather stupid to me. By the way Hillary probably hasn't shopped in a supermarket in several years. Why should she? She has people that do that for her as she has better, more important things to do with her life. The same applies with nearly all wealthy people.
2007-12-03 15:28:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
And you know of a candidate who does? They all dodge things they find inconvenient. Watch Romney walk away from a man in a wheelchair when asked about medical marijuana. It's on Youtube. They're all the same. Hillary's no better or worse. At least she can form a coherent sentence,unlike the current idiot occupying the white house.
2007-12-03 15:03:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
This column is not a news report.
Award-winning humorist, television personality and film actor Andy Borowitz is author of the new book "The Republican Playbook," to be published October 2007. To find out more about Andy Borowitz and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
2007-12-03 15:02:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by davidmi711 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
That is an excellent question to be presented to those who are capable of answering it with accuracy and expedience.
It is one which is extremely timely and should be answered honestly, sincerely and in a dignified manner, so those who are representatives of the media can relay the answer to all those who may have a direct or indirect interest in the contents of an accurate and unbiased reply. My sincerest thanks and gratutude to you for asking such a timely question.
Next question, please.
2007-12-03 15:03:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Satire:
1. the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.
2. a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule.
3. a literary genre comprising such compositions.
You should watch the Daily Show. With friends. Compare their reaction with your own. Theirs is called "getting the joke" and enhances the value of the medium.
2007-12-03 15:02:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is the complex ones that concerns me, she doesn't seem to grasp that this is a national election, and issues important to one area might be different in other areas.
2007-12-03 15:04:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question. You would think one of a simple mind could answer simple questions.Hmm
2007-12-03 15:02:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think she is waiting to get the nomination, then spill the proverbial beans. Or severly PANDERING
2007-12-03 15:00:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
She is a member of yahoo answers.
2007-12-03 15:02:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by here to help 7
·
1⤊
1⤋